Logo do repositório
 

Difference between the results obtained by DIN and ASTM procedures in the bulk density of solid biomasses

dc.contributor.authorBarros, J. L. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMoreira, R.
dc.contributor.authorSantos, J. L.D.
dc.contributor.authorHirayama, D. E.
dc.contributor.authorSouza, L. A.A.A.
dc.contributor.authorMendonça, M. A.
dc.contributor.authorMorais, L. C. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorYamaji, F. M.
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)
dc.contributor.institutionScience and Technological of São Paulo
dc.contributor.institutionInstitute for Technological Research
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T19:29:25Z
dc.date.available2022-04-28T19:29:25Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-01
dc.description.abstractThe standardization of the tests ensures that the methodology used guarantees a reproducibility of the experiment and a reliability of the result. However, to perform some tests on a laboratory scale, an adaptation is necessary to adjust to a quantity of sample or to a non-operational parameter. The objective of this work was to validate and compare two different tests of apparent density for biomass, following the standards ASTM E873 and DIN EN 17828, but with changes (laboratory scale) in the volume to be measured of the sample and the container. The container was made with reduced dimensions proportionately. The procedure was performed by 6 operators (3 DIN and 3 ASTM) with six materials (biomass) of different physical characteristics. The results showed that the procedures of both standards result in approximate values in relation to the bulk density of the materials. It was also observed that the heterogeneity of the material and the manual procedures (suggested by the standard) contributed to some divergences in the results. Finally, it was concluded that a greater repetition is recommended to reduce the error due to variation of results between as measurements.en
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Federal de São Carlos Campus Sorocaba Departamento de Ciências Ambientais Laboratório de Biomassa e Bioenergia
dc.description.affiliationFederal Institute of Education Science and Technological of São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationInstitute for Technological Research
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State University Institute of Science and Technology
dc.description.affiliationFederal University of São Carlos Department of Environmental Sciences
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State University Institute of Science and Technology
dc.format.extent993-1000
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21577/1984-6835.20200080
dc.identifier.citationRevista Virtual de Quimica, v. 12, n. 4, p. 993-1000, 2020.
dc.identifier.doi10.21577/1984-6835.20200080
dc.identifier.issn1984-6835
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85091912155
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/221575
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Virtual de Quimica
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAnalytical method
dc.subjectMeasures
dc.subjectRepeatability
dc.subjectSolid biofuel
dc.titleDifference between the results obtained by DIN and ASTM procedures in the bulk density of solid biomassesen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication

Arquivos

Coleções