Logo do repositório

Size matching between fruits and bill gapes differentially affects gulper and masher frugivorous birds

dc.contributor.authorRojas, Tobias Nicolas
dc.contributor.authorPizo, Marco A. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBlendinger, Pedro G.
dc.contributor.authorMangini, G. Giselle
dc.contributor.authorBarberá, Iván
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidad Nacional de Tucumán & CONICET
dc.contributor.institutionThe Pennsylvania State University
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidad Nacional del Comahue & CONICET
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T20:14:35Z
dc.date.issued2025-01-01
dc.description.abstractBirds feeding on fruits (frugivores) affect seed dispersal, seedling establishment and, ultimately, plant assemblage composition. Thus, the mechanisms underlying fruit consumption by birds are central to disentangling the assembly dynamics of mutualistic interactions and their effects on ecosystem functioning. In this regard, the size-matching hypothesis states that the bill gape width is an anatomical filter that allows a bird to ingest a fruit. However, handling behaviour could allow birds to overcome anatomical constraints that limit the consumption of certain fruit species. Here we tested how size matching affects consumption rates and probabilities of frugivores that swallow the fruit unprocessed (gulpers) and those that mandibulate the fruits before ingestion (mashers). Gulpers showed a weak augment in both the rate and probability of fruit consumption as bill-gape width increased relative to fruit diameter. On the other hand, mashers did not respond to size matching either in consumption rate or probability. Altogether our results highlight that other factors besides size are affecting the consumption rate and probability of frugivorous birds. Thus, gulpers and mashers fruit consumption could be subject to different mechanisms regardless size matching. In this regard, fruit traits and animal abilities interact leading to consumption by mashing or gulping the fruit highlighting the dynamic nature of handling behaviour. Altogether, our results warn about the unevaluated overutilization of size-matching as the main mechanism to test the multiple facets of the ecology and evolution of frugivory and seed dispersal. Thus, including handling behaviour and other factors into the mechanisms underlying fruit–frugivore interactions could greatly improve our understanding of mutualistic interactions.en
dc.description.affiliationInstituto de Ecología Regional Universidad Nacional de Tucumán & CONICET, Tucumán
dc.description.affiliationBiology Department and Ecology Program The Pennsylvania State University
dc.description.affiliationInstituto de Biociências Departamento de Biodiversidade Universidade Estadual Paulista, SP
dc.description.affiliationInstituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente Universidad Nacional del Comahue & CONICET, Rio Negro
dc.description.affiliationUnespInstituto de Biociências Departamento de Biodiversidade Universidade Estadual Paulista, SP
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/oik.10978
dc.identifier.citationOikos.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/oik.10978
dc.identifier.issn1600-0706
dc.identifier.issn0030-1299
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85215431467
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/309182
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofOikos
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectecosystem functioning
dc.subjectfrugivores
dc.subjectfruit traits
dc.subjectmutualistic interactions
dc.subjectseed dispersal
dc.subjecttrait matching
dc.titleSize matching between fruits and bill gapes differentially affects gulper and masher frugivorous birdsen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-5273-8830[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2130-9934[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-4071-8853[4]

Arquivos

Coleções