Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Comparative Stress Evaluation between Bilayer, Monolithic and Cutback All-Ceramic Crown Designs: 3D Finite Element Study

dc.contributor.authorRamos, Nathalia de Carvalho [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRamos, Gabriela Freitas [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPenteado, Marcela Moreira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMelo, Renata Marques de [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBorges, Alexandre Luiz Souto [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorTribst, Joao Paulo Mendes
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Taubate UNITAU
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T17:22:00Z
dc.date.available2022-04-28T17:22:00Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-01
dc.description.abstractDifferent all-ceramic crown designs are available to perform indirect restoration; however, the mechanical response of each model should still be elucidated. The study aims to evaluate the stress distribution in three different zirconia crown designs using finite element analysis. Different three-dimensional molar crowns were simulated: conventional bilayer zirconia covered with porcelain, a monolithic full-contour zirconia crown, and the cutback modified zirconia crown with porcelain veneered buccal face. The models were imported to the computer-aided engineering (CAE) software. Tetrahedral elements were used to form the mesh and the mechanical properties were assumed as isotropic, linear and homogeneous materials. The contacts were considered ideal. For the static structural mechanical analysis, 100 N occlusal load was applied and the bone tissue was fixed. Maximum principal stress showed that the stress pattern was different for the three crown designs, and the traditional bilayer model showed higher stress magnitude comparing to the other models. However, grayscale stress maps showed homogeneous stress distribution for all models. The all-ceramic crown designs affect the stress distribution, and the cutback porcelain-veneered zirconia crown can be a viable alternative to adequate function and esthetic when the monolithic zirconia crown cannot be indicated.en
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ, Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, BR-12220000 Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Taubate UNITAU, Dept Dent, BR-12020270 Tautabe, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ, Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, BR-12220000 Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
dc.format.extent173-180
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis3020017
dc.identifier.citationProsthesis. Basel: Mdpi, v. 3, n. 2, p. 173-180, 2021.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/prosthesis3020017
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/218618
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000668529900001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMdpi
dc.relation.ispartofProsthesis
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectzirconia
dc.subjectceramics
dc.subjectfinite element analysis
dc.subjectdental materials
dc.titleComparative Stress Evaluation between Bilayer, Monolithic and Cutback All-Ceramic Crown Designs: 3D Finite Element Studyen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.rightsHolderMdpi
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, São José dos Campospt
unesp.departmentMateriais Odontológicos e Prótese - ICTpt

Arquivos