Logo do repositório

Evaluation of maxillary canine and molar movement during the first phase of extraction space closure: a multilevel analysis

dc.contributor.authorGandini Júnior, Luiz Gonzaga [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSchneider, Patricia Pigato [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorKim, Ki Beom
dc.contributor.authorMonini, André da Costa
dc.contributor.authorJacob, Helder Baldi
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionCenter for Advanced Dental Education
dc.contributor.institutionHealth Science Center
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T20:16:20Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-01
dc.description.abstractThis study was designed to analyze and compare the cusp and apex movements of the maxillary canines and first molars during canine retraction in the first step of extraction space closure, and to evaluate if these teeth follow a curvilinear (acceleration and/or deceleration) movement rate. Material and Methods: Twenty-five patients (23.3 ± 5.1 years of age) were enrolled. The retraction of the maxillary canines was accomplished using nickel-titanium closed coil springs (100gf) on 0.020-in stainless steel archwire. Oblique cephalograms were traced and superimposed on the anatomic best fit of the maxilla (before the retraction [T0], and after one month [T1], three [T3], five [T5] and seven [T7] months). Statistics was based in a normally distributed data. Multilevel procedures were used to derive polynomials for each of the measurements. Student’s t-test and one-way repeated measures ANOVA were conducted. The level of significance of 5% was adopted. Results: Canine cusps and apexes did not follow a quadratic curve regarding horizontal movement (neither accelerate nor decelerate). Canine and molar cusps showed more horizontal movement than apexes (4.80 mm vs. 2.78 mm, and 2.64 mm vs. 2.17 mm, respectively). Conclusions: Canine did not accelerate or decelerate overtime horizontally; the cusps and apexes of the canines and molars showed more horizontal movement and larger rate at the beginning of canine retraction, followed by significantly smaller and constant movement rate after the first month.en
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) School of Dentistry Department of Orthodontics, SP
dc.description.affiliationSaint Louis University Center for Advanced Dental Education Department of Orthodontics
dc.description.affiliationThe University of Texas School of Dentistry Department of Orthodontics Health Science Center
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) School of Dentistry Department of Orthodontics, SP
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.28.4.e232338.oar
dc.identifier.citationDental Press Journal of Orthodontics, v. 28, n. 4, 2023.
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/2177-6709.28.4.e232338.oar
dc.identifier.issn2177-6709
dc.identifier.issn2176-9451
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85171811710
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/309708
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofDental Press Journal of Orthodontics
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCanine tooth
dc.subjectOrthodontic anchorage procedure
dc.subjectOrthodontic space closure
dc.subjectOrthodontic tooth movement
dc.titleEvaluation of maxillary canine and molar movement during the first phase of extraction space closure: a multilevel analysisen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-8656-6010[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-1425-0687[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-4508-6058[3]
unesp.author.orcid0009-0009-1230-2798[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-2642-0540[5]

Arquivos

Coleções