Repository logo
 

Publication:
Adaptations of muscle tissue of rats submitted to aerobic and anaerobic physical training in different ergometer models

dc.contributor.authorOzaki, Guilherme Akio Tamura
dc.contributor.authorFilho, José Carlos Silva Camargo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCastoldi, Robson Chacon
dc.contributor.authorGarcia, Thiago Alves
dc.contributor.authorAleixo, Paulo Henrique [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCamargo, Regina Celi Trindade [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDo Carmo, Edna Maria [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBelangero, William Dias
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.contributor.institutionUNIP
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Western São Paulo
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-06T16:12:02Z
dc.date.available2019-10-06T16:12:02Z
dc.date.issued2018-12-01
dc.description.abstractThe objective of the present study was to analyze the effects of four different training models, two aerobic and two anaerobic models, in relation to muscular hypertrophy, by means of morphometric analysis of the muscle cells of the soleus muscle and the extensor digitorum longus muscle (EDL). The animals were divided into five groups, control (C), aerobic training in swimming (ATS), resistance training in water (RTW), aerobic training on a treadmill (ATT), and resistance training in climbing (RTC). The aerobic training was performed at 70 % of the anaerobic threshold for 30 minutes, while the RTW was composed of 3 series of 10 jumps, and the RTC 4 series of climbs, both at 80 % of the maximum load. All training protocols were performed for a total period of 4 weeks, 3 times per week. The diameters of the muscle cells were measured by means of histological slides of the EDL and soleus muscles. For the EDL muscle, there was no difference between the ATS and ATT aerobic training models (p = 0.20). However, the RTW presented greater hypertrophy when compared to the RTC (p <0.01). Regarding the soleus muscle, the ATS was responsible for generating greater hypertrophy than the ATT (p <0.01). In addition, the RTC was more efficient at producing hypertrophy than the RTW (p <0.01). In this way, it was concluded that exercise adaptation was according to exercise type, aerobic or anaerobic, and not to the modality used.en
dc.description.affiliationUniversity of Campinas UNICAMP Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology
dc.description.affiliationPaulista University UNIP, Campus Arçatuba
dc.description.affiliationFaculty of Science and Technology FCT/UNESP Department of Physiotherapy, Campus Presidente Prudente
dc.description.affiliationUniversity of Western São Paulo Department of Physical Education
dc.description.affiliationUnespFaculty of Science and Technology FCT/UNESP Department of Physiotherapy, Campus Presidente Prudente
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.format.extent1161-1167
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022018000401161
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Morphology, v. 36, n. 4, p. 1161-1167, 2018.
dc.identifier.doi10.4067/S0717-95022018000401161
dc.identifier.issn0717-9502
dc.identifier.issn0717-9367
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85059317123
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/188558
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Morphology
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectHypertrophy
dc.subjectPhysical endurance
dc.subjectResistance training
dc.subjectSwimming
dc.titleAdaptations of muscle tissue of rats submitted to aerobic and anaerobic physical training in different ergometer modelsen
dc.titleAdaptaciones en tejido muscular de ratas sometidas a entrenamiento físico aeróbico y anaeróbico en diferentes modelos de ergómetroses
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.departmentFisioterapia - FCTpt

Files