Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Effect of different surface treatments on the ceramic veneer surface: Morphological analysis

dc.contributor.authorArchangelo, Karen Cristina [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSato, Tabata Prado [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPenteado, Marcela Moreira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorContreras, Edwin Fernando Ruiz
dc.contributor.authorBorges, Alexandre Luiz Souto [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCorrêa, Giovani De Oliveira
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T17:37:45Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T17:37:45Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface clinical treatments on the roughness (Ra) of a lithium disilicate ceramic veneer. Material and Methods: Forty-eight lithium disilicate discs with ceramic veneer and glaze layer were manufactured and distributed into six groups (n=8) according to the surface treatment performed: G1, glaze layer (control group); G2, diamond bur 4138F; G3, diamond bur 4138F + 4138FF; G4, diamond bur 4138F + new glaze layer; G5, diamond bur 4138F + ceramic polishing kit; G6, diamond bur 4138F + rubber cup with diamond paste + felt with diamond paste. Surface Ra measurement (µm) was performed using a profilometer before and after surface treatments, and one specimen from each group was subjected to Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) after treatment. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (5%) were used for data analysis. Results: Group 2 (3,00 ± 0,61)b showed higher values of Ra, followed by Group 3 (1,93 ± 0,45)c, Group 6 (1,56 ± 0,22)ac, Group 5 (1,14 ± 0,68)a and Group 4 (0,90 ±0,26)a. G4, G5 and G6 were not different between each other and control group (1,11 ± 0,21)a. SEM imaging revealed surface smoothness in G1, G4 and G5, and presence of irregularities in G2, G3 and G6. Conclusion: it is possible to conclude that different surface clinical treatments influences the roughness of a lithium disilicate ceramic veneer.en
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State University (Unesp) Institute of Science and Technology Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics
dc.description.affiliationLondrina State University
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State University (Unesp) Institute of Science and Technology Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics
dc.format.extent88-95
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.14295/bds.2018.v21i1.1533
dc.identifier.citationBrazilian Dental Science, v. 21, n. 1, p. 88-95, 2018.
dc.identifier.doi10.14295/bds.2018.v21i1.1533
dc.identifier.issn2178-6011
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85050077683
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/180033
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian Dental Science
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCeramics
dc.subjectDental polishing
dc.subjectDental porcelain
dc.titleEffect of different surface treatments on the ceramic veneer surface: Morphological analysisen
dc.titleEfeito de diferentes tratamentos na superfície da cerâmica de revestimento: Análise morfológicapt
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.lattes6043459304176015[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-5707-7565[5]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, São José dos Campospt
unesp.departmentMateriais Odontológicos e Prótese - ICTpt

Arquivos