Continuous arch and rectangular loops for the correction of consistent and inconsistent load systems in extruded and tipped maxillary second molars
Loading...
External sources
External sources
Date
Advisor
Coadvisor
Graduate program
Undergraduate course
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier B.V.
Type
Article
Access right
Acesso aberto

External sources
External sources
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this research was to compare the load systems produced by rectangular loops and continuous arches for the correction of extruded second molars with a mesial inclination (inconsistent system) and a distal inclination (consistent system). Methods: The maxillary first molar of an acrylic model of a patient, with passive brackets and tubes bonded, was connected to a 3-dimensional load cell of an orthodontic force tester, and the second molar was replaced by its respective tube bonded to a second load cell. The second molar tube was moved 2.5 mm occlusally and tipped 20 degrees mesially and distally, creating an inconsistent force system and a consistent force system. For each situation, ten 0.017 x 0.025-in beta-titanium, 8 x 10-mm rectangular loops were compared with 10 0.014-in nickel-titanium continuous arches. The vertical forces-F(z)-and tipping moments-M(x)-were compared using 4 t tests, at 5%. Results: In the inconsistent group, the rectangular loop produced a larger M(x) in both molars: 2.11 N.mm in the second molar compared with the 0.15 N.mm of the continuous arches. On the first molar, the rectangular loops produced -5.58 N.mm against -2.08 N.mm produced by the continuous arches. The F(z) values produced at the second molar with each system were similar, whereas on the first molar they were different; the rectangular loops produced 0.41N, and continuous arches produced 0.53N. In the consistent group, the rectangular loops produced smaller M(x) values at the second molar (-3.06 N.mm) than did the continuous arch (-4.25 N.mm) (P = 0.01), as well as a smaller F(z) value (-0.52 vs -0.92 N, respectively). At the first molar, the rectangular loops produced smaller M(x) values (-2.32 N.mm) than did the continuous arch (-4.18 N.mm), as well as a smaller F(z) value (0.59 vs 1.10 N). Conclusions: In the inconsistent group, only the rectangular loop produced a system of force that could correct the second molar. In the consistent system, both group mechanics produced a system of force compatible with the correction of the second molar, but the continuous wire produced larger moments. Both groups showed a tendency for mesial crown tipping of the first molar.
Description
Keywords
Language
English
Citation
American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics. New York: Mosby-elsevier, v. 153, n. 3, p. 396-404, 2018.





