Logo do repositório

Workers’ Psychological Distress During the Early Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil: A Cross-Sectional Study

dc.contributor.authorAlonso, Melissa Spröesser [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLima, Maria Cristina Pereira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDias, Adriano [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorNunes, Hélio Rubens de Carvalho [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRuiz-Frutos, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorFagundo-Rivera, Javier
dc.contributor.authorGómez-Salgado, Juan
dc.contributor.authorBernardes, João Marcos [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Huelva
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidad Espíritu Santo
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Seville
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T19:33:15Z
dc.date.issued2025-03-01
dc.description.abstractThe COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted the mental health of workers. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of psychological distress among Brazilian workers during the early months of the pandemic and explore its associated factors. A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online questionnaire administered to 2903 Brazilian workers, including 1752 non-healthcare workers (NHCWs) and 1151 healthcare workers (HCWs), between April and May 2020. Snowball sampling was employed for participant recruitment, and the research questionnaire was adapted for use with the Brazilian population through a process of translation and cultural adaptation, based on an instrument initially created and validated for use in Spain. Differences between NHCWs and HCWs were tested using the chi-square or Fisher’s Exact test and Mann–Whitney test followed by effect size measurement. Multiple linear regression models were used to analyze the association between psychological distress and the predictor variables. Psychological distress was observed in 72.6% (95% CI 70.1–74.2%) of the participants, with no significant difference observed between NHCWs and HCWs. Although 32 variables showed statistically significant differences between NHCWs and HCWs, only 7 demonstrated clinical–epidemiological relevance, primarily related to occupational factors. Work-related stress was positively associated with psychological distress, but this relationship diminished in the absence of family members infected with COVID-19. Conversely, a higher sense of coherence was protective against psychological distress, although this effect weakened in the absence of family members infected with COVID-19. The study highlights the high prevalence of psychological distress among Brazilian workers during the pandemic’s early months. Work stress played a significant role, while sense of coherence appeared to mitigate mental health challenges. These findings highlight the need for targeted mental health interventions, particularly for workers facing both professional and family-related stressors during crises.en
dc.description.affiliationGraduate Program in Collective/Public Health Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Neurosciences and Mental Health Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Public Health Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationGraduate Program in Nursing Academic Master’s and Doctoral Programs Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Sociology Social Work and Public Health Faculty of Labour Sciences University of Huelva
dc.description.affiliationSafety and Health Postgraduate Programme Universidad Espíritu Santo
dc.description.affiliationCentro Universitario de Enfermería Cruz Roja University of Seville
dc.description.affiliationUnespGraduate Program in Collective/Public Health Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Neurosciences and Mental Health Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Public Health Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationUnespGraduate Program in Nursing Academic Master’s and Doctoral Programs Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs15030358
dc.identifier.citationBehavioral Sciences, v. 15, n. 3, 2025.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/bs15030358
dc.identifier.issn2076-328X
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105001295767
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/303870
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBehavioral Sciences
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCOVID-19
dc.subjectepidemiology
dc.subjectmental health
dc.subjectpreventive medicine
dc.subjectpsychological distress
dc.subjectsocioeconomic aspects of health
dc.titleWorkers’ Psychological Distress During the Early Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil: A Cross-Sectional Studyen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationa3cdb24b-db92-40d9-b3af-2eacecf9f2ba
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya3cdb24b-db92-40d9-b3af-2eacecf9f2ba
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-1446-2439[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-6895-372X[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-7806-1386[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-3715-1382[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-8286-3381[6]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-9053-7730[7]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-4494-9421[8]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina, Botucatupt

Arquivos