Logo do repositório

A novel methodology for detecting separated endodontic instruments using a combination of algorithms in post-processing CBCT software

dc.contributor.authorEstrela, Lucas Rodrigues de Araújo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBueno, Mike Reis
dc.contributor.authorAzevedo, Bruno Correa
dc.contributor.authorde Sousa, Vinicius Caixeta
dc.contributor.authorGuedes, Orlando Aguirre
dc.contributor.authorEstrela, Carlos
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionDiagnostic Imaging Center
dc.contributor.institutionAlbert Einstein Medical Center
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T20:16:28Z
dc.date.issued2025-12-01
dc.description.abstractSeparated endodontics instruments and high-density obturating materials produce metal artifacts on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. This study evaluated a novel methodology to detect separated instruments using artifact suppression and color map algorithms with CBCT post-processing software and compared with periapical radiographs (PRs). Endodontic instruments were incorporated into 168 root canals filled with four sealers. Additionally, 40 root canals were only filled, serving as control. CBCT scans were acquired in PreXion-3D-Elite, and digital PRs were taken in distoradial, mesioradial, orthoradial, and proximal directions. The treated teeth were analyzed using an artifact suppression algorithm combined with a color map algorithm. The separated instruments appear in the color map with larger expansion in red to allow identification. This map provides valuable information by showing dynamic visualization toward the point of expansion of the high-density object, hence suggesting a separated instrument. The chi-square test was used to compare the separated instruments among the imaging methods. Bonferroni correction was used for multiple comparisons. Statistical significance was considered P < 0.05. Overall, CBCT performed significantly better than PRs (P < 0.001) in detecting separated instruments. PR was influenced by all the variables studied (P < 0.05). The artifact suppression and color map algorithms, combined with dynamic navigation, effectively identified separated instrument fragments in all the root canal fillings, regardless of filling material, image view, or root canal. Only 32.3% of the root canal fillings viewed by PR detected separated instrument fragments. This method seems to be useful in the resolution of the problem of viewing separated instruments with CBCT post-processing software.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry São Paulo State University
dc.description.affiliationDiagnostic Imaging Center
dc.description.affiliationIB Bender Postdoctoral Endodontic Program Albert Einstein Medical Center
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Stomatology Sciences Federal University of Goiás
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry São Paulo State University
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 308632/2021-4
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-90652-6
dc.identifier.citationScientific Reports, v. 15, n. 1, 2025.
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41598-025-90652-6
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85219076259
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/309744
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofScientific Reports
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectArtifact
dc.subjectCone-beam computed tomography
dc.subjectEndodontics
dc.subjectSeparated instruments
dc.subjectSoftware
dc.titleA novel methodology for detecting separated endodontic instruments using a combination of algorithms in post-processing CBCT softwareen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-1244-4015[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-2632-2094[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-4514-8768[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2330-0247[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-1664-329X[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-1488-0366[6]

Arquivos

Coleções