Logo do repositório

McGrath MAC Versus Three-Dimensional Printed Video Laryngoscopes: A Randomized, Manikin-Simulated Noninferiority Controlled Study with Medical Students

dc.contributor.authorDetoni, Pablo B. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorNascimento, Jedson S.
dc.contributor.authorAraújo Azi, Liana M.T.
dc.contributor.authorPustilnik, Alexandre G.
dc.contributor.authorGusmão-Cunha, André
dc.contributor.authorMódolo, Norma Sueli P. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCampos, Guilherme O.
dc.contributor.authorde Almeida, Victor S.
dc.contributor.authorCambui, João Pedro M.M.
dc.contributor.authorde Almeida, Vinicius S.
dc.contributor.authorAlves, Rodrigo L. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionSanta Casa de Misericórdia Bahia
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
dc.contributor.institutionD’Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR)
dc.contributor.institutionState University of Feira de Santana
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T19:33:33Z
dc.date.issued2025-02-01
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Proficiency in endotracheal intubation (ETI) is essential for medical professionals and its training should start at medical schools; however, large caseload may be required before achieving an acceptable success rate with direct laryngoscopy. Video laryngoscopy has proven to be an easier alternative for intubation with a faster learning curve, but its availability in medical training may be an issue due to its high market prices. We devised a low-cost 3-dimensionally printed video laryngoscope (3DVL) and performed a randomized trial to evaluate if the intubation success rate on the first attempt with this device is noninferior to a standard commercially available video laryngoscope (STVL). METHODS: Two hundred and nine medical students from 5 medical schools were enrolled and randomized to start with the STVL (McGrath MAC) or the 3DVL. Four stations (standard airway using the STVL/3DVL and difficult airway using the STVL/3DVL) were set to simulate ETI with standard Airway Management Trainer manikins (Laerdal Medical Ltd.). The noninferiority margin of 7.5% was defined for the success rate on the first attempt, considering the difference in proportions between the STVL (expected to be higher) and 3DVL groups. RESULTS: Regarding the standard airway station, 60.7% (n = 65) of the students successfully performed TI on the first attempt with the STVL within the established timeframe, compared to 36.3% (n = 37) of the students using the 3DVL. This represented a difference of 24.4% (95% confidence interval, 17.5%–31.3%). Considering the difficult airway station, the success rates on the first intubation attempt with the 2 VLs did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: The 3DVL was inferior in achieving first-attempt intubation when compared with the STVL with a difference in success rate >7.5% margin in simulated scenarios with medical students. Tracheal intubation might require a set of psychomotor skills for which the McGrath MAC device is superior to the low-cost alternative.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Surgical Specialties and Anesthesiology São Paulo State University (UNESP) Medical School
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Anesthesiology Santa Casa de Misericórdia Bahia
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Anesthesiology and Surgery Bahia School of Medicine Federal University of Bahia
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Anesthesiology São Rafael Hospital D’Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Computer Engineering PGCC-UEFS State University of Feira de Santana
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Surgical Specialties and Anesthesiology São Paulo State University (UNESP) Medical School
dc.format.extent334-341
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000007067
dc.identifier.citationAnesthesia and Analgesia, v. 140, n. 2, p. 334-341, 2025.
dc.identifier.doi10.1213/ANE.0000000000007067
dc.identifier.issn1526-7598
dc.identifier.issn0003-2999
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85215356586
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/303990
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAnesthesia and Analgesia
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleMcGrath MAC Versus Three-Dimensional Printed Video Laryngoscopes: A Randomized, Manikin-Simulated Noninferiority Controlled Study with Medical Studentsen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationa3cdb24b-db92-40d9-b3af-2eacecf9f2ba
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya3cdb24b-db92-40d9-b3af-2eacecf9f2ba
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-7762-168X[5]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina, Botucatupt

Arquivos