Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Biomechanical analysis of locking reconstruction plate using mono-or bicortical screws

dc.contributor.authorSantos, Rogerio Rodrigues [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRahal, Sheila Canevese [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorNeto, Camilo Mesquita
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Celso Roberto
dc.contributor.authorSousa, Edson Antonio Capello [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorFoschini, Cesar Renato [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAgostinho, Felipe Stefan [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDos Reis Mesquita, Luciane [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionIPAC
dc.contributor.institutionDistrito Industrial Uninorte
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T17:03:05Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T17:03:05Z
dc.date.issued2016-05-01
dc.description.abstractThis experimental in vitro study evaluated the influence of screw length on the mechanical properties of a locking reconstruction plate designed with locking rings inserted into plate holes. Synthetic bone cylinders with 10 mm fracture gap and seven-hole locking reconstruction plates were used. Two groups of bone-plate constructs were assembled: Group 1-three monocortical screws on each fracture side, Group 2-three bicortical screws on each fracture side. In each group nine bone-plate constructs were tested until failure, three each in bending, compression and torsion. In each group, 21 bone-plate constructs were tested for failure in fatigue testing, seven each for bending, compression and torsion. In all static testing no significant differences were found between G1 and G2, except ultimate moment in torsion test (G2>G1; P=0.008). Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between groups in axial compression fatigue testing (G1>G2; P<0.05) and four-point bending fatigue testing (G1<G2; P<0.05) in maximum load, minimum load, maximum moment, and minimum moment. In conclusion, screw length can affect the mechanical properties of locking reconstruction plate. Compared to bicortical screws, monocortical screws were less resistant to bending than axial compression. This must be considered when choosing implant, particularly in fractures under high axial loads.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Veterinary Surgery and Anesthesiology School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science Universidade Estadual Paulista-UNESP
dc.description.affiliationLaboratório de Ensaios Mecânicos e Metalográficos - LEMM IPAC
dc.description.affiliationSGS Labmat Distrito Industrial Uninorte
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Engineering Universidade Estadual Paulista-UNESP
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Veterinary Surgery and Anesthesiology School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science Universidade Estadual Paulista-UNESP
dc.description.affiliationUnespSchool of Engineering Universidade Estadual Paulista-UNESP
dc.format.extent588-593
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-5373-MR-2015-0596
dc.identifier.citationMaterials Research, v. 19, n. 3, p. 588-593, 2016.
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/1980-5373-MR-2015-0596
dc.identifier.fileS1516-14392016000300588.pdf
dc.identifier.issn1516-1439
dc.identifier.lattes1922357184842767
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1300-4978
dc.identifier.scieloS1516-14392016000300588
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84970954360
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/173006
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofMaterials Research
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,398
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBone-plate
dc.subjectFracture
dc.subjectMechanical study
dc.titleBiomechanical analysis of locking reconstruction plate using mono-or bicortical screwsen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.lattes1922357184842767[6]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-1300-4978[6]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Botucatupt
unesp.departmentCirurgia e Anestesiologia Veterinária - FMVZpt

Arquivos

Pacote Original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
S1516-14392016000300588.pdf
Tamanho:
1.06 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format