Logo do repositório

How does the chemical composition of dung affect nitrous oxide and methane emissions in pasture soils?

dc.contributor.authorAmaral Júnior, Francisco Paulo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSouza de Sousa, Camila Eduarda [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRafael de Almeida Moreira, Bruno
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues Alves, Bruno José
dc.contributor.authorLonghini, Vanessa Zirondi
dc.contributor.authorda Silva Cardoso, Abmael
dc.contributor.authorRuggieri, Ana Cláudia [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionThe University of Queensland
dc.contributor.institutionEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Wisconsin
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T18:58:50Z
dc.date.issued2025-01-01
dc.description.abstractThere is an important gap in how variations in herbivore dung composition affect GHG emissions on pastures, especially due to differences in dry matter (DM) and nitrogen contents. Oversimplifications can compromise the accuracy of mitigation strategies. This study aims to address this gap by investigating how the chemical composition of dung from different species influences GHG emissions in pasture systems. The results showed that drier dung led to higher cumulative N₂O emissions. The highest emissions were observed from goat at 9.47 mg N-N₂O g⁻1 dry soil, followed by sheep at 5.95 mg N-N₂O g⁻1 dry soil, beef cattle at 5.44 mg N₂O g⁻1 dry soil, dairy cattle at 2.67 mg N₂O g⁻1 dry soil, and horse at 0.83 mg N₂O g⁻1 dry soil. It was observed that higher dung moisture content generally corresponded to increased CH₄ emissions, except for horse dung. The highest cumulative CH₄ emission was for dairy cattle dung (8.29 mg C-CH₄ g⁻1 dry soil), followed by beef cattle (3.89 mg C-CH₄ g⁻1 dry soil), sheep (2.32 mg C-CH₄ g⁻1 dry soil), goats (1.89 mg C-CH₄ g⁻1 dry soil), and horses (1.66 mg C-CH₄ g⁻1 dry soil). Principal Component Analysis illustrated that PC1, named as diet quality, explained 61.9% of the variance, was positively correlated with N₂O and negatively correlated with fiber content and C/N ratio, while PC2, named as acetrophic and hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis, explained 19.6% of the variance, linking VS to reduced CH₄ emissions. This study establishes relationships between manure chemical composition and GHG emissions, filling a fundamental knowledge gap and supporting the development of cause-and-effect models.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Animal Science School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), SP
dc.description.affiliationCentre for Crop Sciences Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI) The University of Queensland
dc.description.affiliationBrazilian Research Corporation (EMBRAPA), RJ
dc.description.affiliationFederal University of Mato Grosso Do Sul (UFMS), MS
dc.description.affiliationUniversity of Wisconsin
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Animal Science School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), SP
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123630
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Environmental Management, v. 373.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123630
dc.identifier.issn1095-8630
dc.identifier.issn0301-4797
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85211117447
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/301644
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Environmental Management
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAnimal excreta
dc.subjectClimate change
dc.subjectGlobal warming potential
dc.subjectGreenhouse gas emissions
dc.subjectLivestock
dc.subjectSustainable development
dc.titleHow does the chemical composition of dung affect nitrous oxide and methane emissions in pasture soils?en
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication3d807254-e442-45e5-a80b-0f6bf3a26e48
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery3d807254-e442-45e5-a80b-0f6bf3a26e48
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-4425-3160[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-6051-9635[6]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Jaboticabalpt

Arquivos