Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Comparison of generic and specific instruments to assess the quality of life in patients with melasma

dc.contributor.authorMeneguin, Silmara [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMourão, Ioana Bitencourt [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPollo, Camila Fernandes [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMiot, Helio Amante [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGaruzi, Miriane [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Cesar de
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity College London
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-01T20:35:51Z
dc.date.available2023-03-01T20:35:51Z
dc.date.issued2022-12-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare the psychometric performance of a generic and specific instruments in assessing melasma-related quality of life. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 150 patients with melasma attending an outpatient dermatology clinic of a public hospital in São Paulo state, Brazil. Data were collected using a questionnaire containing sociodemographic and clinical data as well as the generic WHOQOL-BREF, and the dermatological-specific Skindex-16 and HRQ-Melasma. Results: The overall internal consistency of the domains of the three instruments was ≥ 0.7. A strong positive correlation was identified between the Skindex-16 and HRQ-Melasma domains (0.68-0.78). Item-response theory showed that most Skindex-16 and HRQ-Melasma domains were more informative than WHOQOL-BREF. Conclusion: The three instruments for assessing QOL tested presented good psychometric performance, with satisfactory internal consistency values. Only the two dermatological instruments, however, demonstrated a strong correlation between the domains that assess social, emotional, and functional aspects of QOL, indicating that both were able to identify impairments in other QOL dimensions in addition to the physical domain.en
dc.description.affiliationNursing Department Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (Unesp)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dermatology Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (Unesp)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Epidemiology & Public Health University College London
dc.description.affiliationUnespNursing Department Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (Unesp)
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dermatology Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (Unesp)
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01599-5
dc.identifier.citationBMC Medical Research Methodology, v. 22, n. 1, 2022.
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12874-022-01599-5
dc.identifier.issn1471-2288
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85128446610
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/240856
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Medical Research Methodology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectMelasma
dc.subjectPsychometry
dc.subjectQuality of life
dc.subjectQuestionnaire
dc.titleComparison of generic and specific instruments to assess the quality of life in patients with melasmaen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina, Botucatupt
unesp.departmentDermatologia e Radioterapia - FMBpt
unesp.departmentEnfermagem - FMBpt

Arquivos