Logo do repositório

Salivary proteomic profile of response to different resistance training protocols: A case report

dc.contributor.authorSantos, Karina Oliveira
dc.contributor.authorFilho, Dalton Muller Pessôa [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorVentura, Talita Mendes Oliveira
dc.contributor.authorThomassian, Larissa Tercilia Grizzo
dc.contributor.authorMacedo, Anderson Geremias [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBuzalaf, Marília Afonso Rabelo
dc.contributor.authorBraga, Aline Silva
dc.contributor.authorFaria, Murilo Henrique [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMagalhães, Ana Carolina
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionSanta Clara Campus
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T18:50:45Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-01
dc.description.abstractResistance training (RT) with blood flow restriction (BFR) or high intensity (HI) are effective to increase muscle mass. To understand this effect, techniques known as “omics” are used to identify possible biomarkers. This study analyzed the salivary proteomic profile of healthy individuals trained before and after two RT protocols both designed with eight exercises for upper- and lower-limbs, one performed at low percentage of one-maximum repetition (%1RM) with BFR technique, and other at high %1RM (HI) without BRF technique. Four healthy males between 18 and 28 years participated in the study. Stimulated saliva was collected before (BBFR/BHI) and immediately after (ABFR/AHI) the two RT protocols. All protein-related processing was performed using label-free proteomic. The difference in expression between groups was expressed as p <.05 for downregulated proteins and 1-p >.95 for upregulated proteins. There was difference in salivary flow between ABFR and BBFR (p =.005). For HI, 87 proteins were found after the practice and 119 before. Three hemoglobin isoforms were increased in AHI compared with BHI. In the BFR comparison, 105 proteins were identified after (ABFR) and 70 before (BBFR). Among those increased ABFR, we highlight five hemoglobin isoforms and Deleted in malignant brain tumors 1 protein. Between ABFR and AHI, 17 isoforms of histones, Transaldolase, Transketolase, Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, and Antileukoproteinase were decreased ABFR. For HI, there was an increase in proteins related to oxidative stress and metabolism of the musculoskeletal system, compared with BFR. HI seems to induce higher anabolic signaling to muscle mass increase and antiatherosclerotic effects.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Biological Sciences Bauru School of Dentistry University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationPost-graduate Program in Human Development and Technology Bioscience Institute (IB) São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Physical Education School of Sciences (FC) São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationPos-Graduation Program in Rehabilitation Sciences Institute of Motricity Sciences Federal University of Alfenas Santa Clara Campus, Minas Gerais
dc.description.affiliationHuman Movement Research Laboratory (MOVI-LAB) Department of Physical Education School of Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationUnespPost-graduate Program in Human Development and Technology Bioscience Institute (IB) São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Physical Education School of Sciences (FC) São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationUnespHuman Movement Research Laboratory (MOVI-LAB) Department of Physical Education School of Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: FAPESP 2019/21797-0
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: FAPESP 2020/02175-6
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cbf.3936
dc.identifier.citationCell Biochemistry and Function, v. 42, n. 1, 2024.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cbf.3936
dc.identifier.issn1099-0844
dc.identifier.issn0263-6484
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85182705043
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/300840
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofCell Biochemistry and Function
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectbiomarkers
dc.subjectmolecular biology
dc.subjectocclusion training
dc.subjectstrength training
dc.titleSalivary proteomic profile of response to different resistance training protocols: A case reporten
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationaef1f5df-a00f-45f4-b366-6926b097829b
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryaef1f5df-a00f-45f4-b366-6926b097829b
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-6413-5348[9]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências, Baurupt

Arquivos