Logo do repositório

Efficacy of vitamin C supplementation during pregnancy in the prevention of preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorAlves Pereira, Ana Gabriela [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGonçalves Molino, Gabriela Oliveira
dc.contributor.authorFelix de Farias Santos, Ana Clara
dc.contributor.authorFerreira Dias, Maírla Marina
dc.contributor.authorPimenta, Nicole Dos Santos
dc.contributor.authorCosta Matos da Silva, Pedro Henrique
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Cidade de São Paulo
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Campina Grande
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T20:04:08Z
dc.date.issued2025-01-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: Preterm birth is a leading global cause of neonatal mortality and morbidity, with oxidative stress playing a role in its pathogenesis. Vitamin C, a powerful antioxidant, may help reduce this risk. This study assessed the effectiveness of vitamin C supplementation, both alone and with vitamin E, in preventing preterm birth compared to a placebo. Data source: Databases were systematically searched in PubMed, Cochrane and Embase in December 2023 and updated in May 2024. Study Selection: Included RCTs evaluated vitamin C’s effect on preterm birth and related neonatal outcomes. Data collect: Statistical analyses used a random-effects model for pooled risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed with the I² statistic. Data synthesis: Seventeen RCTs (21,567 patients) were analyzed. Vitamin C supplementation showed no significant difference compared to placebo for preterm birth (RR 1.04; 95% CI 0.96, 1.14). No significant differences were observed for neonatal death (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.55, 1.08), NICU admission (RR 1.03; 95% CI 0.95, 1.13), preterm PROM (RR 1.04; 95% CI 0.63, 1.71), or birth weight (MD 52.41; 95% CI-19.65, 124.47). A slight decrease in gestational age was observed (MD 0.26; 95% CI-0.02, 0.55). Conclusion: Vitamin C supplementation alone or in combination with vitamin E does not significantly prevent preterm birth or improve related neonatal outcomes.en
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, SP
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, RS
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Cidade de São Paulo, SP
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Federal de Campina Grande, PB
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, RJ
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Federal de Goiás, GO
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, SP
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.61622/rbgo/2025rbgo1
dc.identifier.citationRevista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, v. 47.
dc.identifier.doi10.61622/rbgo/2025rbgo1
dc.identifier.issn0100-7203
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105002468503
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/305759
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetricia
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAscorbic acid
dc.subjectFetal membranes, premature rupture
dc.subjectGestational age
dc.subjectIntensive care units, neonatal
dc.subjectPregnancy
dc.subjectPremature birth
dc.subjectVitamin C supplementation
dc.subjectVitamin E
dc.titleEfficacy of vitamin C supplementation during pregnancy in the prevention of preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysisen
dc.typeResenhapt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0009-0003-7023-6254[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-2082-2215[2]
unesp.author.orcid0009-0004-0007-0866[3]
unesp.author.orcid0009-0006-1297-7478[4]
unesp.author.orcid0009-0004-6332-1036[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2707-9324[6]

Arquivos

Coleções