Logo do repositório
 

Greenhouse and field assessment of biological and chemical agents against guava decline

dc.contributor.authorDa Silva Alves, Cintia [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCosta Starling, Renan Zappavigna [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Lilian Lagen
dc.contributor.authorNascimento, Maria Laura Urbano
dc.contributor.authorDe Vargas, Amanda Dutra
dc.contributor.authorDos Reis, Ualace Oliveira
dc.contributor.authorDe Resende Camara, Guilherme
dc.contributor.authorMoraes, Wilian Bucker
dc.contributor.authorDa Silva Xavier, André
dc.contributor.authorAlves, Fábio Ramos
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Espirito Santo (UFES)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T19:43:58Z
dc.date.available2022-04-28T19:43:58Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.description.abstractGuava decline is a complex disease resulting from the parasitism by Meloidogyne enterolobii (Me), which predisposes the plant to root rot caused by Fusarium sp. Three in vitro experiments were carried out with the aim of: (i) selecting the Fluensulfone dosage capable of causing Me mortality; (ii) verifying the effect of Fluensulfone on Pochonia chlamydosporia and Trichoderma harzianum; (iii) evaluating the effect of Pochonia chlamydosporia and Trichoderma harzianum in pure doses and in association with Fluensulfone on Me mortality. Fluensulfone at 2 L.ha-1 had no effect on fungi. The associated and pure doses of treatments had a significant effect on Me mortality. A field experiment was also carried out in a guava orchard where decline occurred. The following treatments were tested: Fluensulfone; P. chlamydosporia; P. chlamydosporia + Fluensulfone; T. harzianum; T. harzianum + Fluensulfone; Carbofuran, and control. All treatments reduced Me population, since relative efficiency was higher than 80%. Fluensulfone used alone or in combination with biological nematicides provided an increase in guava productivity. Maintaining Me population low in the field is an important option for increasing productivity and reducing the losses suffered by farmers.significant effect on Me mortality. A field experiment was also carried out in a guava orchard where decline occurred. The following treatments were tested: Fluensulfone; P. chlamydosporia; P. chlamydosporia + Fluensulfone; T. harzianum; T. harzianum + Fluensulfone; Carbofuran, and control. All treatments reduced Me population, since relative efficiency was higher than 80%. Fluensulfone used alone or in combination with biological nematicides provided an increase in guava productivity. Maintaining Me population low in the field is an important option for increasing productivity and reducing the losses suffered by farmers.en
dc.description.affiliationPaulista State University (UNESP) Postgraduate Program in plant protection
dc.description.affiliationFederal University of Espirito Santo (UFES) Department of Agronomy
dc.description.affiliationUnespPaulista State University (UNESP) Postgraduate Program in plant protection
dc.format.extent96-102
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-5405/225806
dc.identifier.citationSumma Phytopathologica, v. 47, n. 2, p. 96-102, 2021.
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/0100-5405/225806
dc.identifier.issn0100-5405
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85113761337
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/222306
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofSumma Phytopathologica
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectFluensulfone
dc.subjectMeloidogyne enterolobii
dc.subjectPochonia chlamydosporia
dc.subjectTrichoderma harzianum
dc.titleGreenhouse and field assessment of biological and chemical agents against guava declineen
dc.titleAvaliação no campo e em casa de vegetação de agentes biológicos e químicos contra o declínio da goiabapt
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2957-9912[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-1037-2049[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-9882-7281[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-1049-3174[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2506-425X[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-6273-5104[6]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-8181-429X[7]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-7478-7772[8]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-9251-0301[9]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-8200-2891[10]

Arquivos

Coleções