Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Using Machine Learning to Predict Complications in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review

dc.contributor.authorBertini, Ayleen
dc.contributor.authorSalas, Rodrigo
dc.contributor.authorChabert, Steren
dc.contributor.authorSobrevia, Luis [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPardo, Fabián
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidad de Valparaíso
dc.contributor.institutionInstituto Milenio Intelligent Healthcare Engineering
dc.contributor.institutionPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidad de Sevilla
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Queensland
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity Medical Center Groningen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionSchool of Medicine and Health Sciences
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T19:50:21Z
dc.date.available2022-04-28T19:50:21Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-19
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Artificial intelligence is widely used in medical field, and machine learning has been increasingly used in health care, prediction, and diagnosis and as a method of determining priority. Machine learning methods have been features of several tools in the fields of obstetrics and childcare. This present review aims to summarize the machine learning techniques to predict perinatal complications. Objective: To identify the applicability and performance of machine learning methods used to identify pregnancy complications. Methods: A total of 98 articles were obtained with the keywords “machine learning,” “deep learning,” “artificial intelligence,” and accordingly as they related to perinatal complications (“complications in pregnancy,” “pregnancy complications”) from three scientific databases: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. These were managed on the Mendeley platform and classified using the PRISMA method. Results: A total of 31 articles were selected after elimination according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. The features used to predict perinatal complications were primarily electronic medical records (48%), medical images (29%), and biological markers (19%), while 4% were based on other types of features, such as sensors and fetal heart rate. The main perinatal complications considered in the application of machine learning thus far are pre-eclampsia and prematurity. In the 31 studies, a total of sixteen complications were predicted. The main precision metric used is the AUC. The machine learning methods with the best results were the prediction of prematurity from medical images using the support vector machine technique, with an accuracy of 95.7%, and the prediction of neonatal mortality with the XGBoost technique, with 99.7% accuracy. Conclusion: It is important to continue promoting this area of research and promote solutions with multicenter clinical applicability through machine learning to reduce perinatal complications. This systematic review contributes significantly to the specialized literature on artificial intelligence and women’s health.en
dc.description.affiliationMetabolic Diseases Research Laboratory (MDRL) Interdisciplinary Center for Research Territorial Health of the Aconcagua Valley (CIISTe Aconcagua) Center for Biomedical Research (CIB) Universidad de Valparaíso
dc.description.affiliationPhD Program Doctorado en Ciencias e Ingeniería para La Salud Faculty of Medicine Universidad de Valparaíso
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Biomedical Engineering Faculty of Engineering Universidad de Valparaíso
dc.description.affiliationCentro de Investigación y Desarrollo en INGeniería en Salud – CINGS Universidad de Valparaíso
dc.description.affiliationInstituto Milenio Intelligent Healthcare Engineering
dc.description.affiliationCellular and Molecular Physiology Laboratory (CMPL) Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology School of Medicine Faculty of Medicine Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Physiology Faculty of Pharmacy Universidad de Sevilla
dc.description.affiliationUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research (UQCCR) Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences University of Queensland
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Pathology and Medical Biology University of Groningen University Medical Center Groningen
dc.description.affiliationMedical School (Faculty of Medicine) São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationTecnologico de Monterrey Eutra The Institute for Obesity Research School of Medicine and Health Sciences
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Medicine Faculty of Medicine Universidad de Valparaíso, Campus San Felipe
dc.description.affiliationUnespMedical School (Faculty of Medicine) São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversidad de Valparaíso
dc.description.sponsorshipIdUniversidad de Valparaíso: UVA20993
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.780389
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, v. 9.
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fbioe.2021.780389
dc.identifier.issn2296-4185
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85123986963
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/223400
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectartificial intelligence
dc.subjectmachine learning
dc.subjectperinatal complications
dc.subjectprediction model
dc.subjectpredictive tool
dc.subjectpregnancy
dc.titleUsing Machine Learning to Predict Complications in Pregnancy: A Systematic Reviewen
dc.typeResenhapt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina, Botucatupt

Arquivos