Logo do repositório

Estudo epidemiológico das fraturas e lesões do anel pélvico

dc.contributor.authorPereira, Gilberto José Cação [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDamasceno, Erick Ribeiro [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDinhane, Daniel Innocenti [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBueno, Francisco Marques [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLeite, Jaqueline Bartelega Rodrigues [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAncheschi, Bruno da Costa [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T17:09:18Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T17:09:18Z
dc.date.issued2017-05-01
dc.description.abstractObjective This study evaluated the pelvic ring fractures and injuries in patients admitted to and treated at this ward between August, 2012 and January, 2014. Methods 66 patients were submitted to treatment protocols according to their age, gender, skin color, injury mechanism, location of the trauma, classification of their injuries, emergency intervention, associated injuries, injured side of the body, treatment, and mortality. The most relevant data were classified according to statistic procedures, such as Goodman's association test. Measures were compared with Student's t‐test and analysis of variance associated with Tukey's multiple comparison test. Results The mean age was 47 years; white race and male gender were most common. Car or truck accident was the most common cause of injuries, which occurred mainly in urban sites. Type A injuries were the most frequent. 16.6% of the cases were submitted to emergency surgery. 42.4% displayed associated injuries. The right side of the body was the most commonly affected side. Non‐invasive treatment was most commonly used. Death was the outcome in 3% of the cases, associated to high‐energy trauma. Conclusions Pelvic ring fractures and injuries are more often verified among males. In general and among younger individuals, traffic accidents are the most common cause of the injury, while among the elderly, ordinary falls are the most commonly verified cause. The majority of those injuries are suffered in urban areas. Type A fractures are more frequent. The majority of cases do not require emergency intervention nor do they feature associated injuries. Non‐invasive treatment is most common and death outcomes are associated to high‐energy traumas with severe injuries.en
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu (FMB) Departamento de Cirurgia e Ortopedia Grupo de Cirurgia do Quadril
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu (FMB) Departamento de Cirurgia e Ortopedia Grupo de Cirurgia do Quadril
dc.format.extent260-269
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbo.2016.07.021
dc.identifier.citationRevista Brasileira de Ortopedia, v. 52, n. 3, p. 260-269, 2017.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rbo.2016.07.021
dc.identifier.issn1982-4378
dc.identifier.issn0102-3616
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85009775807
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/174093
dc.language.isoeng
dc.language.isopor
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Brasileira de Ortopedia
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,319
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restritopt
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBone fractures/epidemiology
dc.subjectEpidemiologic studies
dc.subjectPelvic bones/injuries
dc.titleEstudo epidemiológico das fraturas e lesões do anel pélvicopt
dc.title.alternativeEpidemiology of pelvic ring fractures and injuriesen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication6e0a9036-4bd6-43e5-9556-6c2945320ec1
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication.latestForDiscovery6e0a9036-4bd6-43e5-9556-6c2945320ec1
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationa3cdb24b-db92-40d9-b3af-2eacecf9f2ba
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya3cdb24b-db92-40d9-b3af-2eacecf9f2ba
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina, Botucatupt
unesp.departmentCirurgia e Ortopedia - FMBpt

Arquivos