Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Institutional memory and organizational memory: Faces of the same coin

dc.contributor.authorDos Santos, Juliana Cardoso
dc.contributor.authorValentim, Marta Lígia Pomim [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-01T11:54:26Z
dc.date.available2022-05-01T11:54:26Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.description.abstractMemory has the characteristic of being ubiquitous and is considered a phenomenon of identification and belonging in which the individual is both subject and object. In this context, the objective is to present some differences between institutional memory and organizational memory in order to show that both are integrated, with no subordination. With regard to methodological procedures, this research is qualitative, typologically descriptive and exploratory. For that, a Systematic Literature Review protocol was carried out, covering the period from 2009 to 2019. It is considered that the findings can contribute to enrich the theoretical framework of the scientific field of Information Science, more specifically with regard to institutional memory related to legitimacy and organizational memory linked to the efficiency and effectiveness of organizations. As a result, it is evident that there are no subordinations, but some particularities and individualities between institutional memory and organizational memory, demonstrating that institutional memory is related to the social value of the group, has difficulty in being practical, realistic and objective, it is in the whole instituted, it is not pragmatic, it is an intentional object and a collective phenomenon that deals with power relations; organizational memory, on the other hand, is practical, pragmatic, objective, at the service, focused on concrete actions and on the construction of management processes, and is focused on productivity. As similarities, it was identified that both memory processes are cyclical, mutable, are under constant construction, are unique and should be considered social phenomena, as they are products of social relations. It is considered that the findings can contribute to enrich the theoretical framework of the scientific field of Information Science, more specifically with regard to institutional memory, related to legitimacy, and organizational memory, linked to the efficiency and effectiveness of organizations.en
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual de Londrina, PR
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista, SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista, SP
dc.format.extent208-235
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1981-5344/4315
dc.identifier.citationPerspectivas em Ciencia da Informacao, v. 26, n. 3, p. 208-235, 2021.
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/1981-5344/4315
dc.identifier.issn1981-5344
dc.identifier.issn1413-9936
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85122281637
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/233969
dc.language.isopor
dc.relation.ispartofPerspectivas em Ciencia da Informacao
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectInstitutional memory
dc.subjectInterrelationships
dc.subjectMemory
dc.subjectOrganizational memory
dc.titleInstitutional memory and organizational memory: Faces of the same coinen
dc.titleMemória institucional e memória organizacional: Faces de uma mesma moedapt
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-6176-749X[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-4248-5934[2]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências, Maríliapt
unesp.departmentCiência da Informação - FFCpt

Arquivos