Atenção!


O atendimento às questões referentes ao Repositório Institucional será interrompido entre os dias 20 de dezembro de 2025 a 4 de janeiro de 2026.

Pedimos a sua compreensão e aproveitamos para desejar boas festas!

Logo do repositório

Effects of different fresh gas flows with or without a heat and moisture exchanger on inhaled gas humidity in adults undergoing general anaesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

dc.contributor.authorBraz, José R.C. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBraz, Mariana G. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorHayashi, Yoko [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Regina H.G. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBetini, Marluci [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBraz, Leandro G. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorEl Dib, Regina [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T17:13:07Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T17:13:07Z
dc.date.issued2017-08-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: The minimum inhaled gas absolute humidity level is 20 mgH2O l-1 for short-duration use in general anaesthesia and 30 mgH2O l-1 for long-duration use in intensive care to avoid respiratory tract dehydration. Objective: The aim is to compare the effects of different fresh gas flows (FGFs) through a circle rebreathing system with or without a heat and moisture exchanger (HME) on inhaled gas absolute humidity in adults undergoing general anaesthesia. Design: Systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. We defined FGF (l min-1) as minimal (0.25 to 0.5), low (0.6 to 1.0) or high (≥2). We extracted the inhaled gas absolute humidity data at 60 and 120 min after connection of the patient to the breathing circuit. The effect size is expressed as the mean differences and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Data Sources: PubMed, EMBASE, SciELO, LILACS and CENTRAL until January 2017. Results: We included 10 studies. The inhaled gas absolute humidity was higher with minimal flow compared with low flow at 120 min [mean differences 2.51 (95%CI: 0.32 to 4.70); P = 0.02] but not at 60 min [mean differences 2.95 (95%CI: -0.95 to 6.84); P = 0.14], and higher with low flow compared with high flow at 120 min [mean differences 7.19 (95%CI: 4.53 to 9.86); P < 0.001]. An inhaled gas absolute humidity minimum of 20 mgH2O l-1 was attained with minimal flow at all times but not with low or high flows. An HME increased the inhaled gas absolute humidity: with minimal flow at 120 min [mean differences 8.49 (95%CI: 1.15 to 15.84); P = 0.02]; with low flow at 60 min [mean differences 9.87 (95%CI: 3.18 to 16.57); P = 0.04] and 120 min [mean differences 7.19 (95%CI: 3.29 to 11.10); P = 0.003]; and with high flow of 2 l min-1 at 60 min [mean differences 6.46 (95%CI: 4.05 to 8.86); P < 0.001] and of 3 l min-1 at 120 min [mean differences 12.18 (95%CI: 6.89 to 17.47); P < 0.001]. The inhaled gas absolute humidity data attained or were near 30 mgH2O l-1 when an HME was used at all FGFs and times. Conclusion: All intubated patients should receive a HME with low or high flows. With minimal flow, a HME adds cost and is not needed to achieve an appropriate inhaled gas absolute humidity.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Anaesthesiology Botucatu Medical School UNESP-Universidade Estadual Paulista, s/n, District of Rubiao Junior
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Ophthalmology Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery (RHGM) Botucatu Medical School UNESP-Universidade Estadual Paulista
dc.description.affiliationTechnical Division of Library and Documentation UNESP-Universidade Estadual Paulista
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Anaesthesiology Botucatu Medical School UNESP-Universidade Estadual Paulista, s/n, District of Rubiao Junior
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Ophthalmology Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery (RHGM) Botucatu Medical School UNESP-Universidade Estadual Paulista
dc.description.affiliationUnespTechnical Division of Library and Documentation UNESP-Universidade Estadual Paulista
dc.format.extent515-525
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000000633
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Anaesthesiology, v. 34, n. 8, p. 515-525, 2017.
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/EJA.0000000000000633
dc.identifier.issn1365-2346
dc.identifier.issn0265-0215
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85021822979
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/174842
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Anaesthesiology
dc.relation.ispartofsjr1,179
dc.relation.ispartofsjr1,179
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restritopt
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleEffects of different fresh gas flows with or without a heat and moisture exchanger on inhaled gas humidity in adults undergoing general anaesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trialsen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationa3cdb24b-db92-40d9-b3af-2eacecf9f2ba
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya3cdb24b-db92-40d9-b3af-2eacecf9f2ba
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina, Botucatupt
unesp.departmentAnestesiologia - FMBpt
unesp.departmentOftalmologia, Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço - FMBpt

Arquivos