Logo do repositório

Ease of handling, physiological response, skin lesions and meat quality in pigs transported in two truck types

dc.contributor.authorDalla Costa, F. A. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorParanhos da Costa, M. J. R. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorFaucitano, L.
dc.contributor.authorDalla Costa, O. A.
dc.contributor.authorLopes, L. S.
dc.contributor.authorRenuncio, E.
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionETCO Grp Estudos & Pesquisa Etol & Ecol Anim
dc.contributor.institutionAgr & Agri Food Canada
dc.contributor.institutionEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)
dc.contributor.institutionCooperat Cent Aurora Alimentos
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-26T17:06:40Z
dc.date.available2018-11-26T17:06:40Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-01
dc.description.abstractA total of 1,728 pigs were transported to slaughter using two double-decked trucks, one featuring a hydraulic deck (HD) to load and unload the upper level and the other presenting a fixed upper deck (FD) only accessible by a ramp. The aim of the research was to evaluate the effects of the loading and unloading system of the truck on behaviour, blood parameters (cortisol, lactate and creatine kinase [CK]), skin lesions and meat quality traits. The use of HD resulted in easier and faster loading (P < 0.05 for both) compared with the FD. Blood cortisol levels were influenced by the loading/unloading system, with lower (P < 0.05) levels being found in pigs using HD transport when compared to those using FD transport. Truck type had no effect on the incidence of skin lesions and pork quality in this study (P > 0.05). It can be concluded that the use of the truck model featuring the upper hydraulic deck should be recommended to ease of handling at loading improving animal welfare and reducing the work load of handlers.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Dept Zootecnia, Jaboticabal, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationETCO Grp Estudos & Pesquisa Etol & Ecol Anim, Jaboticabal, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationAgr & Agri Food Canada, Dairy & Swine R&D Ctr, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada
dc.description.affiliationEMBRAPA Swine & Poultry, Concordia, SC, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationCooperat Cent Aurora Alimentos, Chapeco, SC, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Dept Zootecnia, Jaboticabal, Brazil
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.description.sponsorshipSwine and Poultry Research Centre of Embrapa
dc.description.sponsorshipCooperativa Central Aurora Alimentos
dc.description.sponsorshipCooperativa Regional Itaipu
dc.format.extent299-304
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0301-732X2016000300009
dc.identifier.citationArchivos De Medicina Veterinaria. Valdivia: Univ Austral Chile, Fac Ciencias Veterinarias, v. 48, n. 3, p. 299-304, 2016.
dc.identifier.doi10.4067/S0301-732X2016000300009
dc.identifier.issn0301-732X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/162055
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000385335600009
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUniv Austral Chile, Fac Ciencias Veterinarias
dc.relation.ispartofArchivos De Medicina Veterinaria
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjecttransport
dc.subjecthandling
dc.subjectblood parameters
dc.subjectskin damage
dc.titleEase of handling, physiological response, skin lesions and meat quality in pigs transported in two truck typesen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.rightsHolderUniv Austral Chile, Fac Ciencias Veterinarias
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.departmentZootecnia - FCAVpt

Arquivos