Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Nanomechanical Assessment of Bone Surrounding Implants Loaded for 3 Years in a Canine Experimental Model

dc.contributor.authorAnchieta, Rodolfo B. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGuimarães, Márcia V.M.
dc.contributor.authorSuzuki, Marcelo
dc.contributor.authorTovar, Nick
dc.contributor.authorBonfante, Estevam A.
dc.contributor.authorAtria, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorCoelho, Paulo G.
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionPrivate Practice
dc.contributor.institutionTufts University School of Dental Medicine
dc.contributor.institutionNew York University
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidad de los Andes
dc.contributor.institutionNYU Langone Medical Center
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T16:49:49Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T16:49:49Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose This work evaluated the nanomechanical properties of bone surrounding submerged and immediately loaded implants after 3 years in vivo. It was hypothesized that the nanomechanical properties of bone would markedly increase in immediately and functionally loaded implants compared with submerged implants. Materials and Methods The second, third, and fourth right premolars and the first molar of 10 adult Doberman dogs were extracted. After 6 months, 4 implants were placed in 1 side of the mandible. The mesial implant received a cover screw and remained unloaded. The remaining 3 implants received fixed dental prostheses within 48 hours after surgery that remained in occlusal function for 3 years. After sacrifice, the bone was prepared for histologic and nanoindentation analysis. Nanoindentation was carried out under wet conditions on bone areas within the plateaus. Indentations (n = 30 per histologic section) were performed with a maximum load of 300 μN (loading rate, 60 μN per second) followed by a holding and unloading time of 10 and 2 seconds, respectively. Elastic modulus (E) and hardness (H) were computed in giga-pascals. The amount of bone-to-implant contact (BIC) also was evaluated. Results The E and H values for cortical bone regions were higher than those for trabecular bone regardless of load condition, but this difference was not statistically significant (P >.05). The E and H values were higher for loaded implants than for submerged implants (P <.05) for cortical and trabecular bone. For the same load condition, the E and H values for cortical and trabecular bone were not statistically different (P >.05). The loaded and submerged implants presented BIC values (mean ± standard deviation) of 57.4 ± 12.1% and 62 ± 7.5%, respectively (P >.05). Conclusion The E and H values of bone surrounding dental implants, measured by nanoindentation, were higher for immediately loaded than for submerged implants.en
dc.description.affiliationCentro Universitario do Norte Paulista (UNORP) São Jose do Rio Preto SP Brazil; Visiting Scholar Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics New York University New York NY; Department of Restorative Denstistry Araçatuba Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) SP
dc.description.affiliationPrivate Practice
dc.description.affiliationAssociate Professor Department of Prosthodontics and Operative Dentistry Tufts University School of Dental Medicine
dc.description.affiliationAdjunct Assistant Professor Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics New York University
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Prosthodontics and Periodontology University of São Paulo Bauru School of Dentistry
dc.description.affiliationResearch Professor Universidad de los Andes
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Biomaterials and Biomimetics New York University New York NY; Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering NYU Tandon School of Engineering; and Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery NYU Langone Medical Center
dc.description.affiliationUnespCentro Universitario do Norte Paulista (UNORP) São Jose do Rio Preto SP Brazil; Visiting Scholar Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics New York University New York NY; Department of Restorative Denstistry Araçatuba Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) SP
dc.format.extent71-79
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2017.08.016
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, v. 76, n. 1, p. 71-79, 2018.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joms.2017.08.016
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-85030455320.pdf
dc.identifier.issn1531-5053
dc.identifier.issn0278-2391
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85030455320
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/170223
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,967
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,967
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleNanomechanical Assessment of Bone Surrounding Implants Loaded for 3 Years in a Canine Experimental Modelen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication

Arquivos

Pacote Original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
2-s2.0-85030455320.pdf
Tamanho:
2.32 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:

Coleções