Logo do repositório

Does cone-beam CT convex triangular field of view influence the image shape distortion of high-density materials?

dc.contributor.authorCascante-Sequeira, Deivi
dc.contributor.authorCoelho-Silva, Fernanda [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLopes Rosado, Lucas P.
dc.contributor.authorLucca, Luiza Valdemarca
dc.contributor.authorFreitas, Deborah Queiroz
dc.contributor.authorde-Azevedo-Vaz, Sergio Lins
dc.contributor.authorHaiter-Neto, Francisco
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity Center of Espírito Santo (UNESC)
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Espírito Santo
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T20:10:43Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-01
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To assess the distortion of high-density materials using two CBCT devices presenting convex triangular and cylindrical fields of view (FOVs). Methods and materials: Four high-density cylinders were individually placed in a polymethylmethacrylate phantom. 192 CBCT scans were acquired using the convex triangular and cylindrical FOVs of Veraviewepocs® R100 (R100) and Veraview® X800 (X800) devices. Using HorosTM’s software, two oral radiologists determined the cylinders’ horizontal and vertical dimensional alterations. Nine oral radiologists subjectively identified each cylinder’s axial shape distortion. Statistical analysis comprised Multiway ANOVA (α = 5%), and the Kruskal–Wallis test. Results: The distortion in the axial plane was greater in the convex triangular FOVs for both devices in almost all the materials (p < 0.05). The evaluators subjectively identified a shape distortion in both FOVs for R100 device (p < 0.001), while no distortion was identified for X800 device (p = 0.620). A vertical magnification of all materials was observed in both FOVs for both devices (p < 0.05). No differences among vertical regions (p = 0.988) nor FOVs (p = 0.544) were found for the R100 device, while all materials showed higher magnification in all regions in the cylindrical FOV (p < 0.001) of the X800 device. Conclusions: The convex triangular FOV influenced the axial distortion of the high-density materials in both devices. A vertical magnification was observed in both FOVs of both devices, but it was greater in the cylindrical FOV of the X800 device.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Oral Diagnosis Division of Oral Radiology Piracicaba Dental School University of Campinas
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Surgery Division of Oral Radiology São Paulo State University (Unesp) School of Dentistry
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dentistry University Center of Espírito Santo (UNESC), Espírito Santo
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Clinical Dentistry Federal University of Espírito Santo, Espírito Santo
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Surgery Division of Oral Radiology São Paulo State University (Unesp) School of Dentistry
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversidad de Costa Rica
dc.description.sponsorshipFaculty of Dentistry, McGill University
dc.description.sponsorshipSeerave Foundation
dc.description.sponsorshipIdSeerave Foundation: R100 CBCT
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20230029
dc.identifier.citationDentomaxillofacial Radiology, v. 52, n. 8, 2023.
dc.identifier.doi10.1259/dmfr.20230029
dc.identifier.issn1476-542X
dc.identifier.issn0250-832X
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85177561361
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/307938
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofDentomaxillofacial Radiology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectArtifacts
dc.subjectCone-Beam Computed Tomography
dc.subjectDental Materials
dc.subjectMagnification
dc.titleDoes cone-beam CT convex triangular field of view influence the image shape distortion of high-density materials?en
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication

Arquivos

Coleções