Logo do repositório

Is adhesive bonding with high and low viscosity cements able to revert the negative effect of machining on the fatigue behavior of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic?

dc.contributor.authorMay, Michele Mirian
dc.contributor.authorMachry, Renan Vaz
dc.contributor.authorFraga, Sara
dc.contributor.authorde Andrade, Guilherme Schmitt [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBottino, Marco Antônio [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorValandro, Luiz Felipe
dc.contributor.authorMay, Liliana Gressler
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Santa Maria
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Rio Grande Do Sul
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T20:17:27Z
dc.date.issued2024-03-01
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the fatigue behavior of adhesively cemented machined and polished lithium disilicate discs and compare the influence of the resin cement viscosity used to bond the ceramics to dentin analog substrate. Disc-shaped specimens (n = 15, Ø = 12 mm; thickness = 1.3 mm) of CAD-CAM lithium disilicate (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent) were prepared and divided according to processing and surface finishing (machining (M) – CEREC inLab; and polishing (P) – control) and cement viscosity (high (H) and low (L)). The specimens were treated with self-etching primer and adhesively cemented (Variolink N Base + High or Low viscosity catalyst, Ivoclar Vivadent) to dentin analog discs (Ø = 12 mm; thickness = 2.2 mm). The cemented assemblies were subjected to fatigue testing using a step-stress approach (500−1500 N; step-size of 100 N; 10,000 cycles per step; 20 Hz). Weibull statistics were conducted on fatigue data (95 % CI). Fractographic and topographic analyzes were also performed on a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Considering the same viscosity, machined groups presented statistically lower characteristic fatigue failure load (N) (FFL0 MH 1192 [1111–1278]; ML 1105 [1077–1134]) than their polished controls (FFL0 PH 1350 [1279–1424]; PL 1333 [1276–1392]). No differences were found between cement viscosities, regardless of surface characteristic. It is well known that CAD-CAM machining impairs mechanical performance of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics. Adhesive cementation was not able to revert this negative impact, regardless of cement viscosity. Cement viscosity did not affect the fatigue results.en
dc.description.affiliationPost-Graduate Program in Dental Sciences Federal University of Santa Maria, RS
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Conservative Dentistry Federal University of Rio Grande Do Sul, RS
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University, SP
dc.description.affiliationPost-Graduate Program in Dental Sciences Department of Restorative Dentistry Federal University of Santa Maria, RS
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University, SP
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103618
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, v. 130.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103618
dc.identifier.issn0143-7496
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85182391970
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/309997
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCeramics
dc.subjectFatigue
dc.subjectMilling
dc.subjectResin composite cements
dc.subjectSurface roughness/morphology
dc.titleIs adhesive bonding with high and low viscosity cements able to revert the negative effect of machining on the fatigue behavior of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic?en
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-8107-3145[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-4658-9717[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-7203-6924[6]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-4572-6142[7]

Arquivos

Coleções