Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Structural and quantitative analysis of a mature anaerobic biofilm on different implant abutment surfaces

dc.contributor.authorDe Avila, Erica Dorigatti [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAvila-Campos, Mario Julio
dc.contributor.authorVergani, Carlos Eduardo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSpolidório, Denise Madalena Palomari [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDe Assis Mollo, Francisco [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T16:59:23Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T16:59:23Z
dc.date.issued2016-04-01
dc.description.abstractStatement of problem The longevity of dental implants depends on the absence of inflammation in the periimplant tissue. Similar to teeth, pathogenic bacteria can adhere on implant abutment surfaces and cause periimplant disease and consequently implant loss. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of physical and chemical properties of 2 common materials used as implant abutments, titanium (Ti) and zirconia (ZrO2), and the use of bovine enamel (BE) as a positive control on biofilm formation. Material and methods Biofilm formation was analyzed by growing Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum as monospecies and mixed species biofilms on the surfaces. The mean roughness (Ra) and surface free energy were evaluated for each material. Mature biofilm, formed after 7 days of incubation, was analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively by colony-forming unit and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Results The mean roughness in all disks was ≤0.21 μm and did not affect the bacterial adhesion. Titanium showed a greater degree of hydrophilicity compared with BE after 90 minutes of immersion in saliva. The surface free energy did not show differences, with the highest values for BE. Monospecies biofilms formed by P. gingivalis on Ti, and mixed species biofilm on ZrO2 exhibited small numbers of cells on disk surfaces. By confocal imaging, the mixed species biofilm appeared as a thin layer on ZrO2 surfaces. Conclusions Material surfaces could have a significant impact on biofilm formation. ZrO2 implant abutment surfaces showed a decrease in anaerobic biofilm compared with Ti and BE.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics School of Dentistry at Araraquara São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rua Humaitá, 1680
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Microbiology Institute of Biomedical Science University of São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Physiology and Pathology School of Dentistry at Araraquara São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics School of Dentistry at Araraquara São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rua Humaitá, 1680
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Physiology and Pathology School of Dentistry at Araraquara São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.format.extent428-436
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.09.016
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Prosthetic Dentistry, v. 115, n. 4, p. 428-436, 2016.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.09.016
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-84948799469.pdf
dc.identifier.issn0022-3913
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84948799469
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/172251
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Prosthetic Dentistry
dc.relation.ispartofsjr1,087
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleStructural and quantitative analysis of a mature anaerobic biofilm on different implant abutment surfacesen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.lattes3003130522427820[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-7375-4714[3]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt
unesp.departmentFisiologia e Patologia - FOARpt
unesp.departmentMateriais Odontológicos e Prótese - FOARpt

Arquivos

Pacote Original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
2-s2.0-84948799469.pdf
Tamanho:
7.12 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição: