Logo do repositório
 

Influence of alternative and conventional surface treatments on the bonding mechanism between peek and veneering resin for dental application

dc.contributor.authorVillefort, Regina F.
dc.contributor.authorAnami, Lilian C. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCampos, Tiago M. B.
dc.contributor.authorMelo, Renata M. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorValandro, Luiz F.
dc.contributor.authorvon Zeidler, Sandra L. V.
dc.contributor.authorBottino, Marco A. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionRENORBIO
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionAeronautics Institute of Technology (ITA)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T19:41:00Z
dc.date.available2022-04-28T19:41:00Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-01
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluated the influence of conventional and alternative surface treatments on wettability and the bond strength between polyether ether ketone (PEEK) and veneering resin. PEEK samples were randomly divided into five groups: sandblasting, tribochemical silica coating, etching with 98% sulfuric acid for 5 s, etching with 98% sulfuric acid for 30 s, and tribochemical silica coating plus heated silane. One of them was subjected to analysis by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and ten were analyzed by goniometry (n = 5) and scanning electron microscopy (n = 5). Shear bond strength (SBS) was tested, and failure types were assessed. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey and Duncan tests (all, α = 5%). Treatment with sandblasting and silica coating had the lowest SBS means (4.2 MPa and 4.4 MPa respectively), while sulfuric acid for 5 s showed the highest mean value (12.6 MPa), followed by sulfuric acid for 30 s and tribochemical + heated silane. All failures were classified as adhesive. The lowest mean contact angle was found for the polished (control) and etched group with 98% sulfuric acid for 30 s (83.9◦ ). Etching with 98% sulfuric acid for 5 s increased the SBS between resin and PEEK.en
dc.description.affiliationBiotechnology Postgraduate Program Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES) RENORBIO, 1468 Marechal Campos Avenue
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (UNESP), 777 Eng. José Longo Avenue
dc.description.affiliationPhysics Department Aeronautics Institute of Technology (ITA), 50 Marechal Eduardo Gomes Square
dc.description.affiliationMSc-PhD Post-Graduate Program in Oral Science (Prosthodontic Unit) Faculty of Odontology Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), 1184 Marechal Floriano Peixoto Street
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (UNESP), 777 Eng. José Longo Avenue
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCAPES: 10/2018
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/coatings11060719
dc.identifier.citationCoatings, v. 11, n. 6, 2021.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/coatings11060719
dc.identifier.issn2079-6412
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85108892923
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/221867
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofCoatings
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAirborne-particle abrasion
dc.subjectPolyether ether ketone
dc.subjectShear strength
dc.subjectSulfuric acid
dc.subjectWettability
dc.titleInfluence of alternative and conventional surface treatments on the bonding mechanism between peek and veneering resin for dental applicationen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, São José dos Campospt

Arquivos