Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Ionospheric scintillation impact on ambiguity resolution using ADOP in closed form

dc.contributor.authorSilva, C. M. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAlves, D. B.M. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSouza, E. M.
dc.contributor.authorSetti Junior, P. T. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-06T15:45:46Z
dc.date.available2019-10-06T15:45:46Z
dc.date.issued2019-08-15
dc.description.abstractThe Ambiguity Dilution of Precision (ADOP) is a well-known scalar measure that can be used to infer the strength of the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) model of the carrier phase ambiguities involved in precise relative GNSS positioning. Odijk and Teunissen (2008a) derived closed-form expressions for single-baseline GNSS models that allow verifying the factors affecting the ambiguity resolution as well as the probability of its correct resolution as integer values. However, this weighted-ionosphere ADOP closed form assumes that the standard deviation of the ionosphere delay is dependent on a function associated with the baseline length. This means that a baseline of the same length at different locations around the world and in different moments in time would have the same standard deviation, which in practice is not true. This becomes even worse in regions like Brazil, where the ionospheric anomalies are more intense and frequent, especially in periods of high solar activity. In this work, a new method for calculating the ionospheric delay standard deviation that considers the ionospheric scintillation S4 index is proposed to improve the closed-form ADOP performance. Experiments with a baseline of 280 m located in Presidente Prudente, Brazil (magnetic latitude of around −13°), were carried out. The results showed that in periods of both weak and strong ionospheric scintillation, the introduction of S4 into the ionospheric delay standard deviation was beneficial for ADOP. The average improvement of the ADOP closed form was of around 72% in the analyzed period of weak scintillation and of 35% in the period of strong scintillation. In addition, the results showed that in periods of strong scintillation, relative positioning accuracy is around 100 times worse, up to 30 m, when compared to periods of weak ionospheric scintillation.en
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State University (Unesp) School of Technology and Sciences
dc.description.affiliationState University of Maringa (UEM), Maringá
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State University (Unesp) School of Technology and Sciences
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2013/06325-9
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2016/24861-3
dc.format.extent921-932
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2019.05.031
dc.identifier.citationAdvances in Space Research, v. 64, n. 4, p. 921-932, 2019.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.asr.2019.05.031
dc.identifier.issn1879-1948
dc.identifier.issn0273-1177
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85067073956
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/187739
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAdvances in Space Research
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso abertopt
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAmbiguity Dilution of Precision
dc.subjectAmbiguity resolution
dc.subjectIonospheric scintillation
dc.subjectReal-Time Kinematic (RTK)
dc.subjectRelative positioning
dc.titleIonospheric scintillation impact on ambiguity resolution using ADOP in closed formen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-2023-4237[1]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Presidente Prudentept

Arquivos