Logo do repositório

Intestinal Microbiome Profiles in Broiler Chickens Raised with Different Probiotic Strains

dc.contributor.authorda Silva, Julia Marixara Sousa
dc.contributor.authorAlmeida, Ana Maria De Souza
dc.contributor.authorBorsanelli, Ana Carolina
dc.contributor.authorde Athayde, Flávia Regina Florencio [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorNascente, Eduardo de Paula
dc.contributor.authorBatista, João Marcos Monteiro
dc.contributor.authorGouveia, Alison Batista Vieira Silva
dc.contributor.authorStringhini, José Henrique
dc.contributor.authorLeandro, Nadja Susana Mogyca
dc.contributor.authorCafé, Marcos Barcellos
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T18:41:03Z
dc.date.issued2024-08-01
dc.description.abstractThe composition of the intestinal microbiota can influence the metabolism and overall functioning of avian organisms. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of three different probiotics and an antibiotic on the microbiomes of 1.400 male Cobb® broiler raised for 42 days. The experiment was conducted with the following treatments: positive control diet (basal diet + antibiotic); negative control diet (basal diet without antibiotic and without probiotic); basal diet + Normal Avian Gut Flora (NAGF); basal diet + multiple colonizing strain probiotics (MCSPs); and basal diet + non-colonizing single strain probiotics (NCSSPs). The antibiotic (enramycin—antibiotic growth promoter) and probiotics were administered orally during all experiment (1 to 42 days), mixed with broiler feed. To determine the composition of the microbiota, five samples of ileal digesta were collected from 42-day-old chickens of each experimental group. The alpha and beta diversity of the ileal microbiota showed differences between the groups. MCSPs presented greater richness and uniformity compared to the positive control, negative control, and NCSSPs treatments, while the negative control exhibited greater homogeneity among samples than NCSSPs. MCSPs also showed a higher abundance of the genus Enterococcus. There were differences between the groups for low-abundance taxa (<0.5%), with NAGF showing higher levels of Delftia, Brevibacterium, and Bulleidia. In contrast, NCSSPs had a higher abundance of Ochrobactrum, Rhodoplanes, and Nitrospira. It was concluded that the treatments analyzed in this study induced modulations in the ileal microbiota of the chickens examined.en
dc.description.affiliationVeterinary and Animal Science School Federal University of Goiás, Goiás
dc.description.affiliationFaculty of Veterinary Medicine of Araçatuba São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationUnespFaculty of Veterinary Medicine of Araçatuba São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12081639
dc.identifier.citationMicroorganisms, v. 12, n. 8, 2024.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/microorganisms12081639
dc.identifier.issn2076-2607
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85202641515
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/298983
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofMicroorganisms
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectalternatives to antibiotics
dc.subjectintestinal health
dc.subjectmicrobiome
dc.subjectmodulation
dc.subjectpoultry farming
dc.titleIntestinal Microbiome Profiles in Broiler Chickens Raised with Different Probiotic Strainsen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication1f8041b8-563c-4766-90b9-4dd9c0101666
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery1f8041b8-563c-4766-90b9-4dd9c0101666
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-5699-2569[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-9862-9127[5]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Araçatubapt

Arquivos