Publicação: Does the zirconia cleaning protocol followed by vitrification increase the resin-bond strength to zirconia?
dc.contributor.author | de Carvalho, Rodrigo Furtado | |
dc.contributor.author | Bergoli, César Dalmolin | |
dc.contributor.author | de Melo, Renata Marques [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Anami, Lilian Costa [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Özcan, Mutlu | |
dc.contributor.author | De Carvalho, Isabelle Helena Gurgel | |
dc.contributor.author | de Assunção e Souza, Rodrigo Othavio | |
dc.contributor.institution | Federal University of Juiz de Fora | |
dc.contributor.institution | Federal University of Pelotas | |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) | |
dc.contributor.institution | University of Zurich | |
dc.contributor.institution | Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-05-01T08:45:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-05-01T08:45:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-01-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | Evaluate the influence of cleaning protocols on vitrification patterns, contact angles, and bond strength between zirconia and resin cement. 48 zirconia discs were sectioned, polished, and sintered (15 × 2 mm). The discs were randomized into four groups according to the zirconia cleaning protocol (n = 12), following: CJ (positive control)-sandblasted with 30-µm particles of alumina coated by silica (Cojet/3M); AV (negative control)-cleaning with alcohol + vitrification (glaze); PV-37% phosphoric acid + vitrification; and HFV-10% hydrofluoric acid + vitrification. Next, the surfaces were conditioned with hydrofluoric acid and then silanized. The samples from the CJ treatment group were silanized to proceed with the cementation stage. Resin cement cylinders were built on 10 specimens from each group (ϕ = 3mm, height = 5mm), following the manufacturer’s instructions, and next they were subjected to thermocycling (5000 cycles at 5 °C and 55 °C for 30 s) followed by the shear test (1 mm/min) and failure analysis. Two discs of each group were subjected to contact angle evaluation and surface analysis under SEM. One-way ANOVA (α = 0.05) and Tukey’s test (p < 0.05) were used to analyze the data (MPa). Weibull analysis was performed to evaluate the shear bond strength test data. Our results revealed that the shear bond strength varied among our experimental groups (p < 0.0001). AV=9.5 (0.5)B presented lower bond strength than CJ=10.8 (0.2)A, PV=10.9 (0.2)A, and HFV=10.9 (0.3)A experimental groups. The predominant mode of failure was the adhesive between the resin cement and glaze. Surface treatments have influenced the contact angles (p < 0.0001), following: CJ=41.6 (0.9)C; AV=52.1 (0.7)A; PV=46.8 (0.5)B; and HFV=46.0 (0.9)B. Zirconia cleaning protocols using 37% phosphoric acid or 10% HF followed by glaze application demonstrated to modify the ceramic surface and to increase the bond strength to resin cement after its etching with HF followed by silanization. | en |
dc.description.affiliation | Department of Dentistry Federal University of Juiz de Fora | |
dc.description.affiliation | Faculty of Dentistry Federal University of Pelotas | |
dc.description.affiliation | Department of Dental Materials and Prosthesis Institute of Science and Technology Univ Estadual Paulista–UNESP | |
dc.description.affiliation | Institute of Science and Technology Universidade Estadual Paulista–UNESP | |
dc.description.affiliation | Division of Dental Biomaterials Unit Clinic for Reconstructive Dentistry Center for Dental and Oral Medicine University of Zurich | |
dc.description.affiliation | Department of Dentistry Division of Prosthodontics Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) | |
dc.description.affiliation | Department of Dentistry Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) | |
dc.description.affiliationUnesp | Department of Dental Materials and Prosthesis Institute of Science and Technology Univ Estadual Paulista–UNESP | |
dc.description.affiliationUnesp | Institute of Science and Technology Universidade Estadual Paulista–UNESP | |
dc.identifier | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2021.1970971 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology. | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/01694243.2021.1970971 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1568-5616 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0169-4243 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85114225639 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233472 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.subject | bond strength | |
dc.subject | Ceramic | |
dc.subject | surface treatment | |
dc.subject | zirconia | |
dc.title | Does the zirconia cleaning protocol followed by vitrification increase the resin-bond strength to zirconia? | en |
dc.type | Artigo | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0003-0856-7178[8] | |
unesp.campus | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, São José dos Campos | pt |
unesp.department | Materiais Odontológicos e Prótese - ICT | pt |