Logo do repositório

Dog Breed and Starch Gelatinisation Correlation in Food Digestibility and Faecal Traits

dc.contributor.authorPescuma, Mariana Gilbert [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorXimenes, Thais Oliveira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGarcia, Caroline Alves [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Ramos, Eloise Cristina [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Oliveira, Carolina Cristina [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorHenríquez, Lucas Ben Fiuza
dc.contributor.authorde Souza Theodoro, Stephanie [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLoureiro, Bruna Agy
dc.contributor.authorCarciofi, Aulus Cavalieri [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T18:41:19Z
dc.date.issued2025-03-01
dc.description.abstractLarge dog breeds commonly produce unformed faeces. The present study hypothesised that foods for large dog breeds require higher starch gelatinisation (SG) to reduce organic matter flow to colon. Fifteen Rottweilers (Ro; 49.4 ± 6.12 kg), 18 Beagles (Be; 12.13 ± 1.75 kg) and 20 Shih-Tzus (ST; 4.62 ± 1.15 kg) were fed one of three diets, all based on the same sorghum formulation, processed to obtain three levels of SG: SG90 (91.8% SG), SG50 (50.7% SG) and SG30 (27.4% SG). Foods were provided for 23 days, and the coefficient of total tract apparent digestibility (CTTAD) of nutrients, faecal production and fermentation products, Na, K and Cl apparent absorption and gastrointestinal transit time (GTT) were evaluated. Results were submitted to analysis of variance considering SG, breed and their interactions, and means compared by the Tukey test (p < 0.05). All dogs promptly ate the foods. Faeces scores were lower for Ro than for Be and ST, and lower for SG30 than SG90 (p < 0.05). Faeces pH was higher, and total short-chain fatty acids were lower for SG90 than for SG50 and SG30 (p < 0.01), regardless of breed. No diet effect was observed for GTT (p > 0.05), but it was lower for Ro (41.7 ± 6.2 h) than for ST (48.7 ± 8.6 h). The CTTAD of nutrients was lower for SG30, intermediary for SG50 and higher for SG90 (p < 0.05), and among breeds CTTAD was higher for Be than ST and Ro (p < 0.05), which did not differ from each other, except for crude protein CTTAD which was lower for Ro (p < 0.05). The apparent absorption of Na and K was higher for the SG90 treatment, and for Be in comparison with Ro and ST (p < 0.05). Food SG had a remarkable influence on Ro faeces formation and on the CTTAD in all breeds. Greater fermentation in the colon and lower protein CTTAD may be involved in Ro unformed faeces formation.en
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP), Sao Paulo
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Animal Science State University of Maringá (UEM), Parana Estado
dc.description.affiliationVeterinarian Medicine and Animal Science School Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Bahia
dc.description.affiliationUnespSchool of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP), Sao Paulo
dc.format.extent243-258
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpn.14047
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, v. 109, n. 2, p. 243-258, 2025.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jpn.14047
dc.identifier.issn1439-0396
dc.identifier.issn0931-2439
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105001071618
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/299072
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectbutyrate
dc.subjectextrusion
dc.subjectpelletisation
dc.subjectresistant starch
dc.subjectsorghum
dc.subjectstarch gelatinisation
dc.titleDog Breed and Starch Gelatinisation Correlation in Food Digestibility and Faecal Traitsen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication3d807254-e442-45e5-a80b-0f6bf3a26e48
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery3d807254-e442-45e5-a80b-0f6bf3a26e48
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-9146-0288[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-5588-1533[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-1600-0390[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-8075-458X[7]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-4163-6414[8]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-3859-3983[9]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Jaboticabalpt

Arquivos