Logo do repositório
 

Post-emergence application of herbicides and growth regulators on soybean growth and agronomic performance

dc.contributor.authorNovakoski, Fabiula Patricia
dc.contributor.authorAlbrecht, Leandro Paiola
dc.contributor.authorAlbrecht, Alfredo Junior Paiola
dc.contributor.authorSilva, André Felipe Moreira
dc.contributor.authorMattiuzzi, Mateus Dalpubel
dc.contributor.authorMundt, Tamara Thaís [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorKashivaqui, Eduardo Seity Furlan
dc.contributor.authorWagner, Felipe Gustavo
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Paraná
dc.contributor.institutionCrop Science
dc.contributor.institutionState University of Maringá
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T19:28:36Z
dc.date.available2022-04-28T19:28:36Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-01
dc.description.abstractPlant lodging is among the factors that limit the productive potential of the soybean crop. Growth regulators or even herbicides may be used in pre- and post-emergence of soybean to minimize the chance of lodging. These products can act to reduce plant height or the number of branches. This study aimed to evaluate the growth and agronomic performance of soybean under the post-emergence application of growth regulators and herbicides. Two experiments were conducted in Palotina, Paraná State (PR), Brazil. A randomized complete block design with four replications was used. Treatments consisted of the application mepiquat chloride, trinexapac, cloransulam, lactofen, and control (without application). Crop injury, chlorophyll indices, and variables related to growth and agronomic performance of soybean crop were evaluated. Post-emergence application of lactofen (36 g a.i. ha−1) or cloransulam (33.6 g a.i. ha−1) on soybean (V3–V4) reduced the height of soybean plants, but showed no negative effect on soybean yield. Therefore, these herbicides are alternatives to reduce the lodging of soybean plants. Post-emergence application of mepiquat chloride (100 g a.i. ha−1) was selective to soybean plants, but did not reduce plant growth. Trinexapac application (125 g a.i. ha−1) did not reduce plant growth and had a deleterious potential on soybean yield. Therefore, post-emergence application of trinexapac on soybean is not recommended.en
dc.description.affiliationFederal University of Paraná, Palotina Sector
dc.description.affiliationCrop Science
dc.description.affiliationState University of Maringá
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State University “Júlio de Mesquista Filho
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State University “Júlio de Mesquista Filho
dc.format.extent253-258
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12892-020-00033-w
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Crop Science and Biotechnology, v. 23, n. 3, p. 253-258, 2020.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12892-020-00033-w
dc.identifier.issn2005-8276
dc.identifier.issn1975-9479
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85083830165
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/221464
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Crop Science and Biotechnology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCloransulam
dc.subjectLactofen
dc.subjectMepiquat chloride
dc.subjectPlant height
dc.subjectTrinexapac
dc.subjectYield
dc.titlePost-emergence application of herbicides and growth regulators on soybean growth and agronomic performanceen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication

Arquivos

Coleções