Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Effects of tooth bleaching protocols with violet LED and hydrogen peroxide on enamel properties

dc.contributor.authorCosta, Joatan Lucas de Sousa Gomes [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBesegato, João Felipe [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorZaniboni, Joissi Ferrari [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGalvani, Lucas David [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorKuga, Milton Carlos [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-29T08:39:22Z
dc.date.available2022-04-29T08:39:22Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study evaluated the color change, enamel surface roughness and microhardness after different tooth bleaching protocols, using hydrogen peroxide (HP) and/or violet LED. Methods: Forty bovine specimens (7 × 7 × 2 mm) were randomly distributed into 4 groups: 35% HP, 6% HP, 6% HP + violet LED and violet LED alone. First, the specimens were stained with black tea and then submitted to two bleaching sessions of 30 min with an interval of 7 days. Color change (∆L*, ∆a*, ∆b* and ∆E00) after 24 h of each session and 1 week after the last session was evaluated. Enamel roughness and microhardness were evaluated immediately before the sessions, 24 h and 1 week after the last session. Data were evaluated by ANOVA for repeated measures and Bonferroni post-test or Kruskall-Wallis and Dunn tests (α = 0.05). Representative specimens from each group were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy. Results: 6% HP + violet LED and 35% HP showed the highest color change, while violet LED alone had the lowest results. Enamel roughness analyses showed that 6% HP + violet LED and 35% HP showed changes after two bleaching sessions. No differences were observed regarding enamel microhardness. Conclusions: The use of 6% HP + violet LED showed enhanced bleaching efficacy compared to 35% HP. However, violet LED used alone exhibited the lowest color change. 6% HP + violet LED and 35% HP promoted changes on enamel roughness, while no microhardness changes was observed for any group.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry Araraquara São Paulo State University – UNESP, 1680 Humaitá Street, 3rd floor – Centro, Mail Box: 331
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry Araraquara São Paulo State University – UNESP, 1680 Humaitá Street, 3rd floor – Centro, Mail Box: 331
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2022.102733
dc.identifier.citationPhotodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy, v. 38.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.pdpdt.2022.102733
dc.identifier.issn1873-1597
dc.identifier.issn1572-1000
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85123985718
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/230334
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPhotodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectColor change
dc.subjectHydrogen peroxide
dc.subjectLED
dc.subjectMicrohardness
dc.subjectRoughness
dc.subjectTooth whitening
dc.subjectviolet LED
dc.titleEffects of tooth bleaching protocols with violet LED and hydrogen peroxide on enamel propertiesen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt
unesp.departmentOdontologia Restauradora - FOARpt

Arquivos