Logo do repositório

Coppice and high forest Eucalyptus stands show similar drought resistance on deep soils

dc.contributor.authorCosta, Jenickson R S [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMaciel, Jhuan L M [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Magali R [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCampoe, Otávio C [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorle Maire, Guerric
dc.contributor.authorAlvares, Clayton A [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMartin-StPaul, Nicolas K
dc.contributor.authorBittencourt, Paulo
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Luciano
dc.contributor.authorCagnoni, Leticia B
dc.contributor.authorLaclau, Jean-Paul
dc.contributor.authorNouvellon, Yann
dc.contributor.authorUstulin, Sonia M F [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGuillemot, Joannès
dc.contributor.editorMaurizio Mencuccini
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-10T17:41:11Z
dc.date.issued2025-07-28
dc.description.abstractIncreasing drought under climate change is affecting forests worldwide, raising concerns about management strategies for sustainable wood production. Eucalyptus, the dominant genus in hardwood plantations, can be managed as either coppice or high forest stands, yet the effects of this silvicultural decision on water stress and drought resistance remain largely unexplored. If coppice trees experience reduced water stress during their early growth due to the surviving deep root apparatus from the previous rotation, they may exhibit traits that are less adapted to drought survival. Here, we measured structural stand features (leaf area index, LAI; standing biomass), dehydration-resistance traits (leaf turgor loss point, Ψtlp; xylem vulnerability to embolism, Ψ50), in situ water stress (minimum leaf water potential, Ψmin) and metrics of drought-mortality risk (hydraulic safety margins, HSM) to compare the drought resistance and productivity of 10 Eucalyptus clones growing in deep soils under both high forest and coppice silvicultural treatments in a common garden in southeastern Brazil. Biomass at mid-rotation (3 years after planting) was on average 15% greater in coppice stands, associated with a 32% greater LAI across Eucalyptus clones. Standing biomass of clones grown in coppice could not be predicted from that of high forests. Water stress, drought resistance traits and drought-mortality risks were similar between silvicultural treatments. Some traits (LAI, Ψtlp, Ψ50, Ψtlp-based HSM) exhibited a consistent clonal ranking in both silvicultural treatments, while other traits (Ψmin, Ψmin-based HSM) did not. The hydraulic system of Eucalyptus trees does not plastically respond to coppicing, making coppice a viable option for Eucalyptus management under drought, if appropriate clonal selection is implemented. However, selecting drought-resistant and productive coppice clones based on high forest data should be considered with caution.
dc.description.affiliationGraduate Program in Forest Science, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 01049-010, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Forest Science, Soils and Environment, School of Agriculture, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 01049-010, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Forest Sciences, Federal University of Lavras (UFLA), Lavras, MG 37200, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationCIRAD, UMR Eco&Sols, Montpellier, France
dc.description.affiliationEco&Sols, Univ. Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAe, Institut Agro, IRD, Montpellier, France
dc.description.affiliationSuzano S.A Company, São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationURFM, INRAe, Avignon, France
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Geography, Faculty of Environment, Science and Economy, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
dc.description.affiliationInstitute of Botany, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Forest Sciences, ESALQ, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespGraduate Program in Forest Science, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 01049-010, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Forest Science, Soils and Environment, School of Agriculture, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 01049-010, SP, Brazil
dc.identifierhttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1191207262
dc.identifier.dimensionspub.1191207262
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/treephys/tpaf089
dc.identifier.issn0829-318X
dc.identifier.issn1758-4469
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2321-6926
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4427-2940
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9810-8834
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5227-958X
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7731-6327
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7574-0108
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2225-2957
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2506-214X
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1920-3847
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4385-7656
dc.identifier.pmid40719393
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/321537
dc.publisherOxford University Press (OUP)
dc.relation.ispartofTree Physiology; n. 9; v. 45; p. tpaf089
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restritopt
dc.rights.sourceRightsclosed
dc.sourceDimensions
dc.titleCoppice and high forest Eucalyptus stands show similar drought resistance on deep soils
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationef1a6328-7152-4981-9835-5e79155d5511
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryef1a6328-7152-4981-9835-5e79155d5511
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas, Botucatupt

Arquivos