Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Production cost of creeping fresh market tomatoes in different soil covers

dc.contributor.authorDalbianco, Alessandro Bandeira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSanti, Adalberto
dc.contributor.authorDipple, Fernanda Lourenço
dc.contributor.authorde Oliveira, Regiane Cristina [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDaniel, Diego Fernando
dc.contributor.authorJúnior, Santino Seabra
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionState University of Mato Grosso
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-29T12:39:39Z
dc.date.available2023-07-29T12:39:39Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-01
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to determine the production cost and analyze the economic factors of two creeping fresh market tomato cultivars (Thaíse and Fascínio) grown using different soil covers. The tomato cultivars were evaluated for in natura consumption using a predetermined cycle. The treatments (soil cover types) used in this study were: I) uncovered soil, II) plastic mulching, III) sorghum, IV) Sudan grass, and V) pearl millet. For profitability calculations, the costs and revenues of the study area were accounted for and converted to values per hectare. The effective operating cost, total operating cost, gross revenue, operating profit, profitability index, gross margin, price, and productivity leveling point were considered. The costs of manual operations, tomato seed, fertilization, plastic canvas (double-sided black and white canvas), and irrigation were the highest expenses observed in the production of creeping fresh market tomatoes in relation to the total operating cost. For the Thaíse and Fascínio tomato cultivars, the highest operating profit was Brazilian R$ 143,194.03 and R$ 134,604.53 per hectare, respectively, which was obtained with the soil cover with plastic mulching. The cultivation of creeping fresh-market tomatoes has high economic profitability, especially when using plastic mulching as the soil cover. The two tomato cultivars (Thaíse and Fascínio), when grown on plastic mulching, showed the highest gross margin.en
dc.description.affiliationPaulista State University
dc.description.affiliationState University of Mato Grosso
dc.description.affiliationUnespPaulista State University
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.14295/cs.v14.3884
dc.identifier.citationComunicata Scientiae, v. 14.
dc.identifier.doi10.14295/cs.v14.3884
dc.identifier.issn2176-9079
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85142845862
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/246393
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofComunicata Scientiae
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectcommercialization
dc.subjecteconomic analysis
dc.subjectprofitability
dc.subjectSolanum lycopersicum L
dc.titleProduction cost of creeping fresh market tomatoes in different soil coversen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication

Arquivos

Coleções