Logo do repositório

Evaluation of Masticatory Function, Satisfaction, and Quality of Life Among Users of Complete Dentures Relined with Resilient Materials: A Systematic Review

dc.contributor.authorSantiago, Jeferson Batista
dc.contributor.authorLeão, Rafaella De Souza
dc.contributor.authorPellizzer, Eduardo Piza [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authordo Egito, Belmiro Cavalcanti
dc.contributor.authorde Moraes, Sandra Lúcia Dantas
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Pernambuco
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T20:10:29Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate whether complete dentures (CDs) relined with long-term resilient liners (LTRLs) favor better masticatory function, satisfaction, and quality of life among completely edentulous patients compared to conventional CDs. Materials and Methods: This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist and was registered in PROSPERO (the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; CRD42021258700). The population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) purpose was to determine whether CDs relined with LTRLs favor better masticatory function, satisfaction, and quality of life among completely edentulous patients when compared to CDs. Searches were performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Lilacs, BBO, and OpenGrey databases. Manual searches were also performed to identify additional primary studies. Results: Overall, 3,953 articles were found. After removing duplicates, reading the articles, and applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 15 articles were selected for qualitative analysis, totaling 422 patients with follow-up periods ranging from 1 week to 3 years. Among these, 8 studies assessed masticatory function using different methods, 2 assessed satisfaction, 1 assessed quality of life, and 4 assessed more than one outcome. Through qualitative analysis, LTRLs showed satisfactory results in most studies when compared to CDs in relation to masticatory function, satisfaction, and quality of life. Conclusions: LTRLs favor better masticatory function, satisfaction, and quality of life among completely edentulous patients compared to CDsen
dc.description.affiliationDivision of Oral Rehabilitation Department of Dentistry University of Pernambuco, Pernambuco
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University, São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Faculty of Dentistry University of Pernambuco, Pernambuco
dc.description.affiliationDivision of Oral Rehabilitation Faculty of Dentistry University of Pernambuco, Pernambuco
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University, São Paulo
dc.format.extent210-220
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.11607/IJP.8130
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Prosthodontics, v. 37, n. 2, p. 210-220, 2024.
dc.identifier.doi10.11607/IJP.8130
dc.identifier.issn1942-4426
dc.identifier.issn0893-2174
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85191466930
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/307846
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Prosthodontics
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleEvaluation of Masticatory Function, Satisfaction, and Quality of Life Among Users of Complete Dentures Relined with Resilient Materials: A Systematic Reviewen
dc.typeResenhapt
dspace.entity.typePublication

Arquivos

Coleções