Logo do repositório

Life cycle comparative assessment of pet bottle waste management options: A case study for the city of Bauru, Brazil

dc.contributor.authorMartin, Eduardo J.P. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Deborah S.B.L.
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Luiza S.B.L.
dc.contributor.authorBezerra, Barbara S. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of South Florida
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-25T10:13:31Z
dc.date.available2021-06-25T10:13:31Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.description.abstractThis study analyzed the environmental impacts of nine scenarios for Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) bottle waste disposal, in the city of Bauru, Brazil. Nine scenarios were considered in this study: (1) current (base) scenario (96.4% of PET waste is sent to landfill, 3.6% is sent to sorting cooperatives); (2) 50% to sorting cooperatives, 50% to landfill; (3) 50% to sorting cooperatives, 50% to incineration; (4) 50% to landfill, 50% to incineration; (5) 100% to sorting cooperatives (keeping the current collection distribution); (6) 100% to landfill; (7) 100% to incineration; (8) and (9) 100% sent to sorting cooperatives, with changes in the collection scheme. Life cycle assessment was implemented to compute the impacts for each scenario and compare their environmental performances. The results have shown that recycling is a better option than incineration across all impact categories analyzed. Landfilling had lower net impacts than incineration in all categories, except for ozone depletion and freshwater eutrophication. All recycling scenarios proposed outperformed the current scenario in all impact categories. Even though recycling presents itself as an environmentally-promising alternative, much work still needs to be done for its successful implementation, such as promoting source-separation at home and improving the management strategies of recycling cooperatives, including additional funding and training to support an increased sorting capacity.en
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State University – UNESP Department of Production Engineering
dc.description.affiliationUSF University of South Florida
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State University – UNESP Department of Civl and Environmental Engineering
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State University – UNESP Department of Production Engineering
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State University – UNESP Department of Civl and Environmental Engineering
dc.format.extent226-234
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.08.041
dc.identifier.citationWaste Management, v. 119, p. 226-234.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.wasman.2020.08.041
dc.identifier.issn1879-2456
dc.identifier.issn0956-053X
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85092720227
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/205329
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofWaste Management
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectIncineration
dc.subjectLandfilling
dc.subjectLife cycle assessment
dc.subjectPolyethylene Terephthalate (PET) waste
dc.subjectRecycling
dc.titleLife cycle comparative assessment of pet bottle waste management options: A case study for the city of Bauru, Brazilen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication

Arquivos

Coleções