Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
The Sociology of Bourdieu: evaluation of the scientific production of productivity researchers in Information Science

dc.contributor.authorAlves, Bruno Henrique
dc.contributor.authorTannuri de Oliveira, Ely Francina [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-25T11:21:45Z
dc.date.available2021-06-25T11:21:45Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-01
dc.description.abstractThe scientific field of Information Science is a hierarchical space of positions and is formed by objective relations. This study aims to understand the generation and construction of knowledge by researchers in Information Science with productivity grants in Brazil. Specifically, this study sets out to present Brazilian researchers in Information Science with research productivity grants and to group the different articles they have written, according to the themes of the Working Groups in the Brazilian National Association for Research and Post-Graduate Education in Information Science, known as ANCIB. The research sample consisted of a total of 47 researchers in Information Science with productivity grants, in the first five years from 2005 to 2009, and of 56 researchers in the second five-year period from 2010 to 2014. A total of 317 articles were published in journals in the first five years, and 597 in the second five-year period. These articles were used to make groupings based on the themes of the 11 Working Groups of the Brazilian National Association for Research and Post-Graduate Education in Information Science and to generate the two-mode networks by use of the Ucinet software. We have found that scientific work aims to establish adequate knowledge to operate its development from the objective relations presented by the researchers. We conclude that Brazilian researchers in Information Science with productivity grants involved in such a power game have specific interests defined by that game's mode of operation; that is, there is always competition for prizes, for the best papers, for scientific coordination, among other kinds of competition.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Fed Fluminense, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Marilia, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Marilia, SP, Brazil
dc.format.extent121-145
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.19132/1808-5245263.121-145
dc.identifier.citationEm Questao. Porto Alegre: Univ Federal Rio Grande Sul, Fac Biblioteconomia & Comunicacao, v. 26, n. 3, p. 121-145, 2020.
dc.identifier.doi10.19132/1808-5245263.121-145
dc.identifier.issn1807-8893
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/208827
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000572508900006
dc.language.isopor
dc.publisherUniv Federal Rio Grande Sul, Fac Biblioteconomia & Comunicacao
dc.relation.ispartofEm Questao
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectScientific field
dc.subjectKnowledge Construction
dc.subjectWorking Groups of the ANCIB
dc.titleThe Sociology of Bourdieu: evaluation of the scientific production of productivity researchers in Information Scienceen
dc.typeArtigopt
dcterms.rightsHolderUniv Federal Rio Grande Sul, Fac Biblioteconomia & Comunicacao
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências, Maríliapt

Arquivos