Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Accuracy of Impression Techniques for Impants. Part 2-Comparison of Splinting Techniques

dc.contributor.authorGennari Filho, Humberto [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMazaro, José Vitor Quinelli [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorVedovatto, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorAssunção, Wirley Goncalves [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Paulo Henrique dos [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-30T18:29:59Z
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:43:40Z
dc.date.available2013-09-30T18:29:59Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:43:40Z
dc.date.issued2009-02-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this study was to compare splinting techniques for impression copings of osseointegrated implants with different angulations.Materials and Methods: Replicas (N = 24) of a metal matrix (control) containing two implants at 90 degrees and 65 degrees in relation to the horizontal surface were obtained by using four impression techniques: Technique 1 (T1), direct technique with square copings without union in open trays; Technique 2 (T2), square copings splinted with dental floss and autopolymerizing acrylic resin; Technique 3 (T3), square copings splinted with dental floss and autopolymerizing acrylic resin, sectioned and splinted again with autopolymerizing acrylic resin; Technique 4 (T4), square copings splinted with prefabricated acrylic resin bar. The impression material was polyether. The replicas were individually scanned to capture the images, which were assessed in a graphic computation program. The program allowed the angulation between the bases of the replicas and the reading screws to be measured. The images of the replicas were compared with the matrix image (control), and the differences in angulations from the control image were calculated. The analysis of variance and the Tukey test for comparisons (p < 0.05) were used for statistical analysis.Results: All groups showed significant differences in the implant angulations in comparison with the control group (p < 0.05). Group T1 showed the highest difference (1.019 degrees) followed by groups T2 (0.747 degrees), T3 (0.516 degrees), and T4 (0.325 degrees), which showed the lowest angular alteration compared to the control group. There were significant differences between inclined and straight implants in all the groups, except in group T4.Conclusions: Based on the results, the splinting of pick-up impression copings is indicated for osseointegrated implant impressions. The square copings splinted with a prefabricated acrylic resin bar presented the best results among the pick-up impression techniques evaluated in this study.en
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ, UNESP, Sch Dent Aracatuba, Dept Dent Mat & Prostheses, BR-16015050 São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ, UNESP, Sch Dent Aracatuba, Dept Dent Mat & Prostheses, BR-16015050 São Paulo, Brazil
dc.format.extent172-176
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00325.x
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Prosthodontics-implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry. Malden: Wiley-blackwell, v. 18, n. 2, p. 172-176, 2009.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00325.x
dc.identifier.issn1059-941X
dc.identifier.lattes5335208171935802
dc.identifier.lattes4438747643373395
dc.identifier.lattes0493479801083622
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4100-5153
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/15251
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000207914200016
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Prosthodontics-implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry
dc.relation.ispartofjcr1.745
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restritopt
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectDental implantsen
dc.subjectprosthesisen
dc.subjectimpression techniqueen
dc.titleAccuracy of Impression Techniques for Impants. Part 2-Comparison of Splinting Techniquesen
dc.typeArtigopt
dcterms.licensehttp://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-406071.html
dcterms.rightsHolderWiley-blackwell
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication5f53b343-da2a-4737-96ec-6e2389a6d704
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication.latestForDiscovery5f53b343-da2a-4737-96ec-6e2389a6d704
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
unesp.author.lattes5335208171935802
unesp.author.lattes4438747643373395
unesp.author.lattes0493479801083622[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-8903-0737[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-4100-5153[5]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araçatubapt
unesp.departmentMateriais odontológicos e Prótese - FOApt

Arquivos

Licença do Pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição:
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição: