Logo do repositório

Survey About the Use of Bacterial Inoculants in Brazil: Effects on Silage Quality and Animal Performance

dc.contributor.authorRabelo, Carlos H. S. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMari, Lucas J.
dc.contributor.authorReis, Ricardo A. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDaSilva, T.
dc.contributor.authorSantos, E. M.
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionLallemand Anim Nutr
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-29T11:34:59Z
dc.date.available2023-07-29T11:34:59Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-01
dc.description.abstractOur objective was to report the effect of bacterial inoculants on silage quality and animal responses in Brazil. A survey of bacterial inoculants utilization in Brazil was made based on a total of 178 published articles assessing a widely varied crops (alfalfa, cabbage, cassava, corn, grass, high-moisture corn (HMC), high-moisture sorghum, millet, oat, orange bagasse, peanut forage, sorghum, soybean, stylosantes Campo Grande, sugarcane, and sunflower). Sugarcane and grass silages comprised 58.1% of the total crops investigated. Homolactic inoculation reduced dry matter (DM) losses in alfalfa silages, but not in corn, grass, HMC, and sorghum silages. Heterolactic inoculation enhanced the aerobic stability of corn and HMC silages. The use of heterofermentative lactic acid-bacteria (LAB) was more effective to improve fermentation of sugarcane silages compared to homofermentative LAB. Inoculation impaired the DM intake in cattle fed corn, grass, and sugarcane silages, but DM intake increased in sheep due to inoculation. In some cases, silage digestibility was affected by inoculation. Positive responses to inoculation occurred most often when the compatibility between the bacterial inoculant and crop was better understood (e. g., homolactic inoculation for grass silage and heterolactic inoculation for sugarcane silage). The performance of animals consuming inoculated silages has been investigated in Brazil only a few times, but the data suggest a greater impact of bacterial inoculants on DM intake and weight gain in cattle and sheep than that indicated in temperate conditions.en
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationLallemand Anim Nutr, Aparecida De Goiania, Go, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Fed Vicosa, INCT CA, Dept Anim Sci, Vicosa, MG, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.format.extent3-37
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5772/64472
dc.identifier.citationAdvances in Silage Production and Utilization. Rijeka: Intech Europe, p. 3-37, 2016.
dc.identifier.doi10.5772/64472
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/245015
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000399351100002
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherIntech Europe
dc.relation.ispartofAdvances In Silage Production And Utilization
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectaerobic stability
dc.subjectdigestibility
dc.subjectfermentation
dc.subjectgrowth performance
dc.subjectlactic acid bacteria
dc.titleSurvey About the Use of Bacterial Inoculants in Brazil: Effects on Silage Quality and Animal Performanceen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.rightsHolderIntech Europe
dspace.entity.typePublication

Arquivos

Coleções