Logo do repositório

Volumetric evaluation of temporomandibular joints in patients with a chewing-side preference: a CBCT study

dc.contributor.authorDantas Costa, Eliana [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorFarias Gomes, Amanda
dc.contributor.authorSouza de Assis, Afonso Celso
dc.contributor.authorBovi Ambrosano, Glaucia Maria
dc.contributor.authorde Castro Lopes, Sérgio Lúcio Pereira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Taubaté
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T18:40:45Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluated the influence of chewing-side preference on the volume of the mandibular condyle and coronoid process and the dynamic parameters of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). Cone beam computed tomographic scans of both TMJs of 90 individuals with a chewing-side preference were obtained while the patients were in the closed-mouth and maximum mouth-opening positions (test power ≥ 0.80). The preferred chewing side was identified with a chewing gum test as well as by patient self-reports of preferred side and hemispheric dominance (ie, dominant side of the body). Two trained examiners assessed the volume of the mandibular condyle and coronoid process and the dynamic parameters of the TMJs on both sides. The volumes of the mandibular condyle on the 2 sides were compared using a paired t test (α = 0.05). McNemar and Bowker tests of symmetry (α = 0.05) were used for concordance analyses of the dynamic parameters of the TMJ on the chewing and nonchewing sides. No statistically significant difference was observed in the volume of the mandibular condyle (chewing gum test, P = 0.4548; interview, P = 0.7191; hemispheric dominance, P = 0.3471) or coronoid process (chewing gum test, P = 0.7718; interview, P = 0.8072; hemispheric dominance, P = 0.8301) on the chewing and nonchewing sides, regardless of the method used to identify chewing preference. The preferred chewing side also did not significantly affect the dynamic parameters of the mandibular condyle (P = 0.5538). Chewing-side preference does not influence the volume of the mandibular condyle or coronoid process or the dynamic parameters of the TMJ.en
dc.description.affiliationDivision of Oral Radiology Department of Oral Diagnosis Piracicaba Dental School University of Campinas
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Social Dentistry Araraquara School of Dentistry São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dentistry University of Taubaté
dc.description.affiliationDivision of Biostatistics Department of Social Dentistry Piracicaba Dental School University of Campinas
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery São Paulo State University
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Social Dentistry Araraquara School of Dentistry São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery São Paulo State University
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCAPES: 001
dc.format.extent38-43
dc.identifier.citationGeneral Dentistry, v. 69, n. 1, p. 38-43, 2021.
dc.identifier.issn0363-6771
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85099113784
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/298883
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofGeneral Dentistry
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectcone beam computed tomography
dc.subjectmandibular condyle
dc.subjectmastication
dc.subjecttemporomandibular joint
dc.titleVolumetric evaluation of temporomandibular joints in patients with a chewing-side preference: a CBCT studyen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationca4c0298-cd82-48ee-a9c8-c97704bac2b0
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryca4c0298-cd82-48ee-a9c8-c97704bac2b0
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt

Arquivos