Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Emergency department interventions for adult patients with low back pain: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials

dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Crystian B. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAmorim, Hugo E.
dc.contributor.authorCoombs, Danielle M.
dc.contributor.authorRichards, Bethan
dc.contributor.authorReedyk, Marco
dc.contributor.authorMaher, Chris G.
dc.contributor.authorMachado, Gustavo C.
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Western Sao Paulo Unoeste
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Sydney & Sydney Local Hlth Dist
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Sydney
dc.contributor.institutionRoyal Prince Alfred Hosp
dc.contributor.institutionConcord Repatriat Gen Hosp
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-25T12:33:37Z
dc.date.available2021-06-25T12:33:37Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.description.abstractBackground Most low back pain trials have limited applicability to the emergency department (ED) because they provide treatment and measure outcomes after discharge from the ED. We investigated the efficacy and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions delivered in the ED to patients with non-specific low back pain and/or sciatica on patient-relevant outcomes measured during the emergency visit. Methods Literature searches were performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL from inception to week 1 February 2020. We included all randomised controlled trials investigating adult patients (>= 18 years) with non-specific low back pain and/or sciatica presenting to ED. The primary outcome of interest was pain intensity. Two reviewers independently screened the full texts, extracted the data and assessed risk of bias of each trial using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. The overall quality of evidence, or certainty, provided by a set of trials evaluating the same treatment was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, which considers imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness and bias in the evidence. Results Fifteen trials (1802 participants) were included with 12 of 15 at low risk of bias (ie, PEDro score >6). Based on results from individual trials and moderate quality evidence, ketoprofen gel was more effective than placebo for non-specific low back pain at 30 min (mean difference (MD) -15.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) -21.0 to -9.0). For those with sciatica (moderate quality evidence), intravenous paracetamol (acetaminophen) (MD -15.7, 95% CI -19.8 to -11.6) and intravenous morphine (MD -11.4, 95% CI -21.6 to -1.2) were both superior to placebo at 30 min. Based on moderate quality of evidence, corticosteroids showed no benefits against placebo at emergency discharge for non-specific low back pain (MD 9.0, 95% CI -0.71 to 18.7) or sciatica (MD -6.8, 95% CI -24.2 to 10.6). There were conflicting results from trials comparing different pharmacological options (moderate quality evidence) or investigating non-pharmacological treatments (low quality evidence). Conclusion Ketoprofen gel for non-specific low back pain and intravenous paracetamol or morphine for sciatica were superior to placebo, whereas corticosteroids were ineffective for both conditions. There was conflicting evidence for comparisons of different pharmacological options and those involving non-pharmacological treatments. Additional trials measuring important patient-related outcomes to EDs are needed.en
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ, Fac Sci & Technol, Dept Phys Therapy, Presidente Prudente, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Western Sao Paulo Unoeste, Presidente Prudente, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Sydney & Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Inst Musculoskeletal Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
dc.description.affiliationUniv Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
dc.description.affiliationRoyal Prince Alfred Hosp, Rheumatol Dept, Sydney, NSW, Australia
dc.description.affiliationConcord Repatriat Gen Hosp, Emergency Dept, Sydney, NSW, Australia
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ, Fac Sci & Technol, Dept Phys Therapy, Presidente Prudente, SP, Brazil
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipNHMRC
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2018/10837-9
dc.format.extent59-68
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2020-209588
dc.identifier.citationEmergency Medicine Journal. London: Bmj Publishing Group, v. 38, n. 1, p. 59-68, 2021.
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/emermed-2020-209588
dc.identifier.issn1472-0205
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/209915
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000608475700012
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBmj Publishing Group
dc.relation.ispartofEmergency Medicine Journal
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.titleEmergency department interventions for adult patients with low back pain: a systematic review of randomised controlled trialsen
dc.typeResenha
dcterms.rightsHolderBmj Publishing Group
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.departmentFisioterapia - FCTpt

Arquivos