Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Scientometric analysis of global trypanosomiasis research: 1988–2017

dc.contributor.authorHassan, Musa Dauda
dc.contributor.authorCastanha, Renata Cristina Gutierres [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorWolfram, Dietmar
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Wisconsin – Milwaukee
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-12T01:08:31Z
dc.date.available2020-12-12T01:08:31Z
dc.date.issued2020-04-01
dc.description.abstractBackground and objectives: This study provides a longitudinal scientometric analysis of global trypanosomiasis research between 1988 and 2017 as indexed in Clarivate Analytics’ Web of Science (WoS). Contributions by researchers from different countries and continents are outlined based on publication productivity, international collaborations, citation analysis, and keyword analysis. Methods: Bibliographic records of research publications indexed by WoS were downloaded based on a broad search of related terms. The authors compared the growth of literature by continent using 5-year increments, conducted a citation and co-authorship analysis by country, and a keyword analysis by publication using the scientometric visualization software VOSviewer. Results: The trypanosomiasis research literature has seen more than a fourfold annual increase in production over the study period. Contributions by authors affiliated with European and South American countries proportionately account for the most research literature. The United States and Brazil, however, occupy central roles for citations and as national contributors to the literature. The terms ‘trypanosomiasis cruzi’ and ‘chagas disease’ have become more prominent, reflecting the regional growth of research from South America. Interpretation and conclusion: Relative contributions from regions where the disease is prevalent show mixed developments. Contributions by African authors have declined proportionately to other areas of the world. However, South American contributions have increased during the study period. The contributing countries to the literature do not necessarily represent regions in which the diseases are prevalent. The same is true of the citation relationships, where European and North American contributions are more frequently cited.en
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Information Studies University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee, P.O. Box 413
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP/Marilia), 737 Hygino Muzzi Filho Avenue
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP/Marilia), 737 Hygino Muzzi Filho Avenue
dc.format.extent514-520
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2019.10.006
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Infection and Public Health, v. 13, n. 4, p. 514-520, 2020.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jiph.2019.10.006
dc.identifier.issn1876-035X
dc.identifier.issn1876-0341
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85076525264
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/198281
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Infection and Public Health
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCitation analysis
dc.subjectCollaboration
dc.subjectLiterature growth
dc.subjectScientometrics
dc.subjectTrypanosoma
dc.subjectTrypanosomiasis
dc.titleScientometric analysis of global trypanosomiasis research: 1988–2017en
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-0167-4213[2]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências, Maríliapt

Arquivos