Logo do repositório
 

Durability of Microtensile Bond to Nonetched and Etched Feldspar Ceramic: Self-adhesive Resin Cements vs Conventional Resin

dc.contributor.authorAssuncao Souza, Rodrigo Othavio
dc.contributor.authorCastilho, Anderson A. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorFernandes, Virgilio V. B. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorValandroe, Luiz Felipe
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T14:05:04Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T14:05:04Z
dc.date.issued2011-04-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of thermocycling (TC), self-adhesive resin cements and surface conditioning on the microtensile bond strength (mu TBS) between feldspathic ceramic blocks and resin cements.Materials and Methods: Fifty-six feldspathic ceramic blocks (10 x 7 x 5 mm) (Vita Mark II) were divided into groups according to the factors "resin cement" (3 cements) and "surface conditioning" (no conditioning or conditioning [10% hydrofluoric acid etching for 5 min + silanization]) (n = 8): group 1: conditioning+Variolink II (control group); group 2: no conditioning+Biscem; group 3: no conditioning+RelyX U100; group 4: no conditioning+Maxcem Elite; group 5: conditioning+Biscem; group 6: conditioning+RelyX U100; group 7: conditioning+Maxcem Elite. The ceramic-cement blocks were sectioned to produce non-trimmed bar specimens (adhered cross-sectional area: 1 +/- 0.1 mm(2)), which were divided into two storage conditions: dry, mu TBS immediately after cutting; TC (12,000x, 5 degrees C/55 degrees C). Statistical significance was deterimined using two-way ANOVA (7 strategies and 2 storage conditions) and the post-hoc Tukey test (p<0.05).Results: Resin cement and thermocycling affected the mu TBS significantly (p = 0.001). In the dry condition, group 5 (18 +/- 6.5 MPa) presented the lowest values of mu TBS when compared to the other groups. TC decreased the mean mu TBS values significantly (p<0.05) for all resin cements tested (9.7 +/- 2.3 to 22.1 +/- 6.3 MPa), except for the resin cement RelyX U100 (22.1 +/- 6.3 MPa). In groups 3 and 4, it was not possible to measure mu TBS, since these groups had 100% pre-test failures during sectioning. Moreover, the same occurred in group 2 after TC, where 100% failure was observed during thermocycling (spontaneous failures).Conclusion: Hydrofluoric acid etching and silanization of the feldspathic ceramic surface are essential for bonding self-adhesive resin cement to a feldspathic ceramic, regardless of the resin cement used. Non-etched ceramic is not recommended.en
dc.description.affiliationFed Univ Santa Maria UFSM, Dept Restorat Dent, Div Prosthodont, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationFed Univ Paraiba UFPB, Dept Restorat Dent, Div Prosthodont, Joao Pessoa, Paraiba, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ UNESP, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Sao Jose dos Campos Dent Sch, Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ UNESP, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Sao Jose dos Campos Dent Sch, Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
dc.format.extent155-162
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a18784
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Adhesive Dentistry. Hanover Park: Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, v. 13, n. 2, p. 155-162, 2011.
dc.identifier.doi10.3290/j.jad.a18784
dc.identifier.issn1461-5185
dc.identifier.lattes9234456003563666
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/22823
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000289754300008
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishing Co Inc
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Adhesive Dentistry
dc.relation.ispartofjcr1.691
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,839
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectbond strengthen
dc.subjectfeldspathic ceramicen
dc.subjectresin cementsen
dc.subjectceramic surface treatmenten
dc.subjectthermocyclingen
dc.titleDurability of Microtensile Bond to Nonetched and Etched Feldspar Ceramic: Self-adhesive Resin Cements vs Conventional Resinen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://www.quintpub.com/journals/jad/permissions.php
dcterms.rightsHolderQuintessence Publishing Co Inc
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.lattes9234456003563666
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, São José dos Campospt
unesp.departmentMateriais Odontológicos e Prótese - ICTpt

Arquivos

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição:
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição: