Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Assessing the surface roughness of a posterior resin composite: Effect of surface sealing

dc.contributor.authorTakeuchi, Cristina Yoshie Garcia [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorOrbegoso Flores, Victor Humberto [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPalma Dibb, Regina Guenka
dc.contributor.authorPanzeri, Heitor
dc.contributor.authorLara, Elza Helena Guimarães
dc.contributor.authorDinelli, Welingtom [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T19:56:07Z
dc.date.available2022-04-28T19:56:07Z
dc.date.issued2003-05-01
dc.description.abstractThis study assessed the in vitro influence of surface sealing on the surface roughness of a posterior resin composite before and after toothbrushing. Thirty specimens (13 mm diameter x 1 mm high) were fabricated from Filtek-P60 resin composite and randomly assigned to three groups (n=10): a non-sealed control and two groups sealed with one of the tested materials - a surface-penetrating sealant (Protect-it!-PI) and a one bottle adhesive system (Single Bond-SB). The samples were subjected to a surface roughness reading to determine the initial roughness, then submitted to simulated toothbrushing with 35,600 cycles for 100 minutes. Specimens were then cleaned and a post-abrasion surface roughness reading accomplished. Means (μm), recorded before (B) and after (A) toothbrushing, and standard deviations were: Control - (B): 0.032 (±0.005), (A): 0.054 (±0.005); PI - (B): 0.034 (±0.005), (A): 0.060 (±0.034); SB (B): 0.031 (±0.004), (A): 0.047 (±0.007). Data were tabulated and submitted to two-way ANOVA. No statistically significant difference was observed when the control and experimental groups were compared. However, a significant difference (p<0.05) was found between the measurements performed before and after toothbrushing. Based on these results, it may be concluded that using either a surface penetrating sealant or a one bottle adhesive system did not provide the optimization of superficial integrity. The use of a dentifrice and toothbrush resulted in significant alterations to the surface smoothness of the resin composite.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Araraquara Dental School São Paulo State University, São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationAraraquara Dental School São Paulo State University, São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Operative Dentistry Ribeirão Preto Dental School University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationDept. of Dent. Mat./Prosthodontics Ribeirão Preto Dental School University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationDept. of Pharmaceutical Sciences Pharmaceutical Sciences School University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Araraquara Dental School São Paulo State University, São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationUnespAraraquara Dental School São Paulo State University, São Paulo
dc.format.extent281-286
dc.identifier.citationOperative Dentistry, v. 28, n. 3, p. 281-286, 2003.
dc.identifier.issn0361-7734
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0141927881
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/224368
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofOperative Dentistry
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleAssessing the surface roughness of a posterior resin composite: Effect of surface sealingen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication901124bf-5736-4432-b057-7c29dec84b50
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication.latestForDiscovery901124bf-5736-4432-b057-7c29dec84b50
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationca4c0298-cd82-48ee-a9c8-c97704bac2b0
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryca4c0298-cd82-48ee-a9c8-c97704bac2b0
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt
unesp.departmentOdontologia Restauradora - FOARpt

Arquivos