Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Randomized clinical trial evaluating single maxillary gingival recession treatment with connective tissue graft and tunnel or trapezoidal flap: 2-year follow-up

dc.contributor.authorNeves, Felipe Lucas da Silva [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAugusto Silveira, Camila [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMathias-Santamaria, Ingrid Fernandes [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMiguel, Manuela Maria Viana [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorFerraz, Laís Fernanda Ferreira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCasarin, Renato Correa Viana
dc.contributor.authorSallum, Enilson Antônio
dc.contributor.authorTatakis, Dimitris N.
dc.contributor.authorSantamaria, Mauro Pedrine [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.contributor.institutionThe Ohio State University
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-12T02:46:09Z
dc.date.available2020-12-12T02:46:09Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: The literature lacks long-term evidence regarding outcomes of the coronally advanced tunnel flap (TUN) combined with connective tissue graft (CTG) when compared to the trapezoidal coronally advanced flap (CAF) and CTG combination. This study presents 2-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing CTG combined with either CAF or TUN in the treatment of single maxillary gingival recession (GR) defects. Methods: Thirty-nine patients, each contributing a single Miller Class I or II GR defect, were treated by CAF+CTG (control; n = 19) or TUN+CTG (test; n = 20) and completed the 2-year follow up. Clinical, patient centered, and esthetic evaluations were performed and differences among groups were analyzed. Results: At 2 years, mean root coverage for control and test group was 89.5% ± 14.6% and 87.7% ± 18.4%, respectively (P = 0.5). The corresponding complete root coverage prevalence was 68.4% and 50% (P = 0.4). Dentin hypersensitivity significantly decreased for both groups. The two groups showed improvement in esthetics, as assessed by both professionals and patients, without significant intergroup differences (P > 0.5). TUN+CTG sites were much more likely to present improvement in root coverage between 6 months and 2 years, exhibiting creeping attachment of 0.7 ± 0.6 mm. Conclusions: At 2 years of follow up, both CAF+CTG and TUN+CTG resulted in significant clinical and esthetic improvements and provided similar results in the treatment of single maxillary GRs.en
dc.description.affiliationUNESP – São Paulo State University Division of Periodontology College of Dentistry
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Prosthodontics and Periodontics Periodontics Division Piracicaba Dental School University of Campinas – UNICAMP
dc.description.affiliationDivision of Periodontology College of Dentistry The Ohio State University
dc.description.affiliationUnespUNESP – São Paulo State University Division of Periodontology College of Dentistry
dc.format.extent1018-1026
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/JPER.19-0436
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Periodontology, v. 91, n. 8, p. 1018-1026, 2020.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/JPER.19-0436
dc.identifier.issn0022-3492
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85088012228
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/201954
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Periodontology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectclinical trial
dc.subjectdentin hypersensitivity
dc.subjectesthetics, dental
dc.subjectgingival recession
dc.subjectsurgical flaps
dc.titleRandomized clinical trial evaluating single maxillary gingival recession treatment with connective tissue graft and tunnel or trapezoidal flap: 2-year follow-upen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-1743-5855[6]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-6327-3610[8]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-9468-0729[9]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, São José dos Campospt
unesp.departmentDiagnóstico e Cirurgia - ICTpt

Arquivos