Logo do repositório

Can bioelectrical stimulation favor orthodontic treatment? A randomized clinical trial to evaluate tooth movement, patient-centered, and inflammatory biomarker outcomes

dc.contributor.authorBarsi, Paula Caroline
dc.contributor.authorSantamaria, Mauro Pedrine
dc.contributor.authorCasarin, Renato Corrêa Viana
dc.contributor.authorStolf, Camila Schmidt
dc.contributor.authorVedovello, Sílvia Amélia Scudeler
dc.contributor.authorZuppardo, Marcelo Lelis [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBautista, Cristhian Reynaldo Gomez [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorZaniboni, Ewerton
dc.contributor.authorMathias-Santamaria, Ingrid Fernandes
dc.contributor.authorSantamaria-Jr, Milton [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity Center of the Hermínio Ometto Foundation
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Kentucky
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Maryland
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T20:12:16Z
dc.date.issued2023-12-01
dc.description.abstractExogenous bioelectrical stimulation (BES) modulates the bone remodeling. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of BES on clinical, patient-centered, and inflammatory biomarker outcomes of orthodontic tooth movement (OTM). A randomized clinical trial (n = 28) matched for sex (8 men and 6 women in each group) were divided into the control group with a sham device (ie, mouthpiece turned off): OTM + SHAM (mean age of 19.4 years), and the test group: OTM + BES (mean age of 20.1 years). Orthodontic alignment was performed with 0.012-in, 0.014-in, and 0.016-in nickel-titanium wires. BES (10 μA/5 min) was applied immediately after each wire installation, after 48 hours, and once a week until the next wire. The canine-to-canine crowding and little dental irregularity index in the mandibular arch were analyzed. Pain perception was measured at 0, 24, 48, and 72 hours after replacement of the 0.014-in and 0.016-in wires. Inflammatory biomarkers were assessed 48 hours after the replacement of the 0.014-inch wire in gingival fluid. The crowding difference was greater in the OTM + BES than in the OTM + SHAM after 2- and 3-month evaluations and the little index was lower in OTM + BES after 3 months of treatment. During the 0.014-in wire alignment, patient pain perception was lower in the OTM + BES than in the OTM + SHAM at 24 and 48 hours, and lower after 24 hours in the 0.016-in wire alignment. BES treatment increased IL-6 and decreased IL-10 levels in gingival fluid after 48 hours of dental alignment. Exogenous bioelectrical stimulation can accelerate initial OTM, decrease patient pain perception, and modulate inflammatory biomarkers.en
dc.description.affiliationGraduate Program in Orthodontics University Center of the Hermínio Ometto Foundation, São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationCenter for Oral Health Research College of Dentistry University of Kentucky
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Periodontics and Prosthodontics College of Dentistry University of Campinas, São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Periodontology College of Denistry Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University, São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of General Denistry University of Maryland
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Social and Pediatric Dentistry College of Denistry Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University, São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Periodontology College of Denistry Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University, São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Social and Pediatric Dentistry College of Denistry Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University, São Paulo
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 304269/2019-0
dc.format.extent464-472
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xaor.2023.09.004
dc.identifier.citationAJO-DO Clinical Companion, v. 3, n. 6, p. 464-472, 2023.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.xaor.2023.09.004
dc.identifier.issn2666-4305
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85187937005
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/308375
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAJO-DO Clinical Companion
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleCan bioelectrical stimulation favor orthodontic treatment? A randomized clinical trial to evaluate tooth movement, patient-centered, and inflammatory biomarker outcomesen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-5125-2326[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-7203-2867[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-1732-0313[7]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-3490-5030 0000-0002-3490-5030[10]

Arquivos

Coleções