Logo do repositório

Effect of Glutaraldehyde on Dentin Hypersensitivity after Non-surgical Periodontal Therapy: A Randomized, Triple-blinded Clinical Study

dc.contributor.authorSilva, Fábio Alves
dc.contributor.authorBarros, Antonia Patricia Oliveira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAlencar, Cristiane de Melo
dc.contributor.authorCarneiro, Alexandra Melo Pingarilho
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Cecy Martins
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal do Pará (UFPA)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T18:43:10Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-01
dc.description.abstractAims and Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of 5% glutaraldehyde (5% Gluma), in association with 37% phosphoric acid conditioning, on dentin hypersensitivity (DH) after non-surgical periodontal treatment (NSPT). Additionally, we investigated the impact of these treatments on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods: Ninety hypersensitive teeth of subjects were randomized into the following three groups based on treatment (n = 30): GP: placebo gel that simulates 37% phosphoric acid (37% PA) + distilled water, GPG: placebo gel that simulates 37% PA + 5% Gluma, and GAG: 37% PA + 5% Gluma. Two visual analog scales (VASs) were used to measure DH after tactile and evaporative stimulation four times. The HRQoL was recorded using a DH experience questionnaire (DHEQ). Statistical analysis of DH data was performed using Friedman vs. Kruskal-Wallis tests. DHEQ data were analyzed using Wilcoxon vs. Mann–Whitney tests and a simple logistic regression (α= 0.05). Results: The GPG and GAG groups showed significantly lower DH than GP (p ≤ 0.05) for tactile and evaporative stimulations. After one month of follow-up, the GPG and GAG groups showed an increase in HRQoL, which was higher than that of the GP group (p ≤ 0.05). Gluma (5%) effectively prevented DH for up to 15 days after NSPT, regardless of previous conditioning with phosphoric acid. In addition, treatment with 5% gluma had a positive impact on HRQoL. Conclusion: The treatment with 5% glutaraldehyde was effective in HD and had a positive impact on quality of life.en
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Dentistry Federal University of Pará, Avenue Augusto Corrêa no 1, Guamá, PA
dc.description.affiliationAraraquara Dental School São Paulo State University, São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationUnespAraraquara Dental School São Paulo State University, São Paulo
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2174/18742106-v17-230718-2023-32
dc.identifier.citationOpen Dentistry Journal, v. 17.
dc.identifier.doi10.2174/18742106-v17-230718-2023-32
dc.identifier.issn1874-2106
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85172245389
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/299677
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofOpen Dentistry Journal
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectDental scaling
dc.subjectDentin desensitizing agents
dc.subjectDentin sensitivity
dc.subjectDentistry
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trial
dc.subjectTreatment
dc.titleEffect of Glutaraldehyde on Dentin Hypersensitivity after Non-surgical Periodontal Therapy: A Randomized, Triple-blinded Clinical Studyen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationca4c0298-cd82-48ee-a9c8-c97704bac2b0
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryca4c0298-cd82-48ee-a9c8-c97704bac2b0
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt

Arquivos