Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Paraquat and Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

dc.contributor.authorVaccari, Carolina [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorEl Dib, Regina [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGomaa, Huda
dc.contributor.authorLopes, Luciane C
dc.contributor.authorde Camargo, João Lauro [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionMcMaster University
dc.contributor.institutionDalhousie University
dc.contributor.institutionAlexandria University
dc.contributor.institutionMinistry of Health
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Sorocaba (UNISO)
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-06T15:55:24Z
dc.date.available2019-10-06T15:55:24Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01
dc.description.abstractThis investigation aimed to conduct a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis to determine whether exposure to the herbicide paraquat was associated with the development of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Observational studies that enrolled adults exposed to paraquat with PD as the outcome of interest were searched in the PubMed, Embase, LILACS, TOXNET, and Web of Science databases up to May 2019. Two authors independently selected relevant studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality. The evidence certainty was assessed by the GRADE approach, which served as basis for a tentative causality assessment, supplemented by the Bradford Hill criteria when necessary. Results from nine case–control studies indicated that PD occurrence was 25% higher in participants exposed to paraquat. The only cohort investigation included demonstrated a non-significant OR of 1.08. Results from subgroup analyses also indicated higher PD frequency in participants that were exposed to paraquat for longer periods or individuals co-exposed with paraquat and any other dithiocarbamate. Data indicate apositive association between exposure to paraquat and PD occurrence, but the weight-of-evidence does not enable one to assume an indisputable cause–effect relationship between these two conditions. Better designed studies are needed to increase confidence in results. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42017069994.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Pathology São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Biosciences and Oral Diagnosis Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationMcMaster Institute of Urology St. Joseph’s Healthcare McMaster University
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Community Health and Epidemiology Dalhousie University
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Bio-statistics High Institute of Public Health Alexandria University
dc.description.affiliationDrug Information Center Tanta Chest Hospital Ministry of Health
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences University of Sorocaba (UNISO)
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Pathology São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Biosciences and Oral Diagnosis Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2019.1659197
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Toxicology and Environmental Health - Part B: Critical Reviews.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10937404.2019.1659197
dc.identifier.issn1521-6950
dc.identifier.issn1093-7404
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85071729224
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/188041
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Toxicology and Environmental Health - Part B: Critical Reviews
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectGRADE
dc.subjectmeta-analysis
dc.subjectParaquat
dc.subjectParkinson’s disease
dc.subjectsystematic review
dc.titleParaquat and Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studiesen
dc.typeResenha
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-7670-734X[1]

Arquivos

Coleções