Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Influence of Different Pigment Incorporation Methods on the Sorption and Solubility of Medical Silicones

dc.contributor.authorNobrega, Adhara Smith [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDe Moraes Melo Neto, Clóvis Lamartine [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDe Magalhães Bertoz, André Pinheiro [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDe Melo Moreno, André Luiz [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGoiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-25T11:05:39Z
dc.date.available2021-06-25T11:05:39Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01
dc.description.abstractObjective  The aim of this study is to verify the influence of three pigment incorporation methods (conventional, mechanical, and industrial) on the sorption and solubility of the MDX4-4210 and A-2186 silicones. Materials and Methods  The groups formed were based on the silicones used (A-2186 and MDX4-4210), intrinsic pigments (pink, bronze, and black), and pigment incorporation methods (conventional, mechanical, and industrial). The dimensions of all samples were 45-mm diameter (o) × 1-mm thickness. Readings were taken initially and after 1,008 hours of aging. Statistical Analysis  Three-way analysis of variance and the Tukey's test were performed (α = 0.05). Results  For sorption and solubility, there was no difference between the incorporation methods for the A-2186 silicone, regardless of the pigment used (p > 0.05). For pink MDX4-4210, the industrial and mechanical methods showed higher values of sorption compared with the conventional method (p < 0.05). For bronze MDX4-4210, the industrial method showed a higher sorption value compared with the conventional and mechanical methods (p < 0.05). For black MDX4-4210, there was no difference between incorporation methods based on sorption (p > 0.05). For pink MDX4-4210, the mechanical method showed a higher solubility value compared with the industrial and conventional methods (p < 0.05). For black MDX4-4210 and bronze MDX4-4210, there was no statistically significant difference between incorporation methods based on solubility (p > 0.05). Conclusion  Based on sorption and solubility, for the A-2186 silicone, the conventional, mechanical, and industrial methods of pigment incorporation were equivalent. For the MDX4-4210 silicone, its results of sorption and solubility were varied, and further studies are recommended.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University (Unesp) School of Dentistry
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Pediatric and Social Dentistry São Paulo State University (Unesp) School of Dentistry
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University (Unesp) School of Dentistry
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Pediatric and Social Dentistry São Paulo State University (Unesp) School of Dentistry
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1716598
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Dentistry.
dc.identifier.doi10.1055/s-0040-1716598
dc.identifier.issn1305-7464
dc.identifier.issn1305-7456
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85093533383
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/208058
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Dentistry
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectA-2186
dc.subjectmaxillofacial prosthesis
dc.subjectsilicone elastomers
dc.subjectsolubility
dc.titleInfluence of Different Pigment Incorporation Methods on the Sorption and Solubility of Medical Siliconesen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication5f53b343-da2a-4737-96ec-6e2389a6d704
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication.latestForDiscovery5f53b343-da2a-4737-96ec-6e2389a6d704
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araçatubapt
unesp.departmentMateriais odontológicos e Prótese - FOApt

Arquivos