Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Computer aided design modelling and finite element analysis of premolar proximal cavities restored with resin composites

dc.contributor.authorMatuda, Amanda Guedes Nogueira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSilveira, Marcos Paulo Motta [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDe Andrade, Guilherme Schmitt [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPiva, Amanda Maria De Oliveira Dal [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorTribst, João Paulo Mendes
dc.contributor.authorBorges, Alexandre Luiz Souto [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorTestarelli, Luca
dc.contributor.authorMosca, Gabriella
dc.contributor.authorAusiello, Pietro
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Taubaté (UNITAU)
dc.contributor.institution“Sapienza” University of Rome
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Naples Federico II
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-25T11:15:50Z
dc.date.available2021-06-25T11:15:50Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluated the stress distribution in five different class II cavities of premolar models restored with conventional or bulk-fill flowable composite by means of finite element analysis (FEA) under shrinkage and occlusal loading. An upper validated premolar model was imported in the software, and five class II cavities with different occlusal extensions and dimensions were prepared: horizontal cavity on the mesial surface (horizontal slot), mesio-occlusal cavity, mesial cavity (vertical slot), tunnel type cavity and direct access cavity. The models were restored with conventional or bulk-fill flowable resin composite. The tested materials were considered as homogeneous, linear, and isotropic. The Maximum Principal Stress criteria was chosen to evaluate the tensile stress results. The lowest shrinkage stress value was observed in the direct access cavity restored with bulk-fill flowable resin composite (36.12 MPa). The same cavity, restored with conventional composite showed a score of 36.14 MPa. The horizontal slot cavity with bulk-fill flowable showed a score of 46.71 MPa. The mesio-occlusal cavity with bulk-fill flowable had a score of 53.10 MPa, while with conventional composite this was 55.35 MPa. Higher shrinkage stress was found in the vertical slot cavity with conventional resin 56.14 MPa, followed by the same cavity with bulk-fill flowable 56.08 MPa. Results indicated that the use of bulk-fill flowable composite resin more significantly decreased the polymerization shrinkage stress magnitude. The larger the cavity and the volume of material necessary to restore the tooth, the greater the residual stress on enamel and dentin tissue.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dentistry University of Taubaté (UNITAU)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Oral and Maxillo Facial Sciences “Sapienza” University of Rome
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Neurosciences Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences School of Dentistry University of Naples Federico II
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14092366
dc.identifier.citationMaterials, v. 14, n. 9, 2021.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ma14092366
dc.identifier.issn1996-1944
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85105579901
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/208664
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofMaterials
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectDental inlays
dc.subjectDental materials
dc.subjectDental prosthesis
dc.subjectFinite element analysis
dc.subjectMechanical stress
dc.titleComputer aided design modelling and finite element analysis of premolar proximal cavities restored with resin compositesen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2969-2077[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-5697-2947[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-3844-2053[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-5707-7565[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-5412-3546[6]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-3904-3000[7]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, São José dos Campospt
unesp.departmentEngenharia Mecânica - FEBpt
unesp.departmentMateriais Odontológicos e Prótese - ICTpt

Arquivos